Time Scale Problem: Solving Diffusion Time of Particles in 2D Space

  • Thread starter Thread starter ishmandoo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scale Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the diffusion time for particles in a two-dimensional space, focusing on parameters like particle speed, scatterer density, and linear cross-section for scattering. Participants express confusion about the definitions of density and cross-section, with density being clarified as the number of scatterers per square meter. The linear cross-section is explained as a measure of the likelihood of scattering events occurring. There is a request for further clarification on the normalization of these parameters. Overall, the thread highlights the need for foundational understanding in tackling the diffusion time problem.
ishmandoo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am having a lot of trouble starting the following problem. Any ideas? Thanks a lot for helping!

Derive from first principles, the diffusion time for particles traveling at speed v in a two dimensional (x,y) space to reach a distance R from their release point if the scatterers have a density n(m^-2) and linear cross section for scatter \sigma(m) Let each particle scatter with equal probability into the +/- x, +/-y directions.

I don't know what some of these things mean and they aren't explained well in my book or anywhere i look. What is the density it is referring to? What is the linear cross section for scatter? Again, thanks for any help.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Density n(m^-2) is number per square meter. The cross-section determines the probability of scatter - I am not sure how the normalization has been set up.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top