Time-shifted Integral with Unit Impulse Function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the integral involving a unit impulse function and a shifted function, specifically the integral \(\int_{-\infty}^\infty f(2 -t) \delta(3 -t) \, dt\). The subject area includes properties of the Dirac delta function and techniques of integration involving substitutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts a substitution method to evaluate the integral and questions the correctness of their approach. Participants raise concerns about the impact of changing integration limits during substitution and discuss the implications of the Dirac delta function's properties.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's approach, providing insights into the effects of variable substitution on integration limits. There is a recognition of the need to clarify the mathematical details involved, particularly regarding the evaluation of the integral and the treatment of the Dirac delta function.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the assumptions made during the substitution process and the interpretation of the Dirac delta function, including its evenness and the implications for the integral's evaluation.

Les talons
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Evaluate the integral.
[tex]\int_{-\infty}^\infty f(2 -t) \delta(3 -t) \, dt[/tex]

Homework Equations


The Unit Impulse function is defined
[tex]\hspace{18mm} \delta(0) = 0 \hspace{10mm} t \neq 0[/tex]
[tex]\hspace{-15mm} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \delta(t) \, dt = 1[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


Using a u-substitution ##u = 3 -t##, ##dt = -du##, ##t = 3 -u##
[tex]\int_{-\infty}^\infty f(2 -t) \delta(3 -t) \, dt[/tex]
[tex]= \int_{-\infty}^\infty f(2 -(3 -u)) \delta(u) (-1) \, du[/tex]
[tex]= -\int_{-\infty}^\infty f(u -1) \delta(u) \, du[/tex]
[tex]= -f(0 -1)[/tex]
[tex]= -f(-1)[/tex]

Please let me know if the above is unclear. My question is 1) Is this the right solution? and 2) Trusted sources tell me that the answer is just ##f(-1)##. Which is the correct answer? Is there some mathematical detail I am missing? Hope this is clear, and hope you can help. ##\mathcal{Thanks}##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You did a substitution of u = 3-t. And so you got a du instead of a dt. Good. What happens to the limits on the integral?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Les talons
Les talons said:
Is there some mathematical detail I am missing?
Yes, you have changed the integration limits when you did the variable substitution. ##u\to -\infty## when ##t\to +\infty##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Les talons
For the lower limit of the integral, since ##t \rightarrow -\infty##, ##u \rightarrow 3 -(-\infty) \rightarrow 3 +\infty \rightarrow \infty##, and in the upper limit of the integral, ##t \rightarrow \infty##, implying ##u \rightarrow 3 -\infty \rightarrow -\infty##. The net effect is to annihilate the ##-1## in front of the integral, giving the evaluation ##f(-1)##. Thank you both for the insight!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Les talons

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K