Time-shifted Integral with Unit Impulse Function

Les talons
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Evaluate the integral.
\int_{-\infty}^\infty f(2 -t) \delta(3 -t) \, dt

Homework Equations


The Unit Impulse function is defined
\hspace{18mm} \delta(0) = 0 \hspace{10mm} t \neq 0
\hspace{-15mm} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \delta(t) \, dt = 1

The Attempt at a Solution


Using a u-substitution ##u = 3 -t##, ##dt = -du##, ##t = 3 -u##
\int_{-\infty}^\infty f(2 -t) \delta(3 -t) \, dt
= \int_{-\infty}^\infty f(2 -(3 -u)) \delta(u) (-1) \, du
= -\int_{-\infty}^\infty f(u -1) \delta(u) \, du
= -f(0 -1)
= -f(-1)

Please let me know if the above is unclear. My question is 1) Is this the right solution? and 2) Trusted sources tell me that the answer is just ##f(-1)##. Which is the correct answer? Is there some mathematical detail I am missing? Hope this is clear, and hope you can help. ##\mathcal{Thanks}##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You did a substitution of u = 3-t. And so you got a du instead of a dt. Good. What happens to the limits on the integral?
 
  • Like
Likes Les talons
Les talons said:
Is there some mathematical detail I am missing?
Yes, you have changed the integration limits when you did the variable substitution. ##u\to -\infty## when ##t\to +\infty##
 
  • Like
Likes Les talons
For the lower limit of the integral, since ##t \rightarrow -\infty##, ##u \rightarrow 3 -(-\infty) \rightarrow 3 +\infty \rightarrow \infty##, and in the upper limit of the integral, ##t \rightarrow \infty##, implying ##u \rightarrow 3 -\infty \rightarrow -\infty##. The net effect is to annihilate the ##-1## in front of the integral, giving the evaluation ##f(-1)##. Thank you both for the insight!
 
  • Like
Likes Les talons
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top