Time taken for energy to transfer ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SirSE
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on developing a real-time physics engine that models energy transfer between soft-body particles. The user seeks information on the time taken for energy to transfer, noting that this process is not instantaneous and varies by material. Suggestions include considering the speed of sound in materials as a way to understand energy propagation. The user plans to use intuitive results for plausibility rather than strict realism in their model. A demo of the engine is expected to be released in the coming months.
SirSE
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello all.

I'm currently looking at developing a realtime physics engine based on energy concepts. It will model all objects as soft-bodies but I need some source material that gives information on the time taken for energy to transfer between particles. I know that the transfer of this energy is not instantaneous, otherwise all bodies would be rigid (which they aren't), but, unfortunately, I cannot find any material that discusses such a concept.

If you look at a golf ball being hit by a driver during a very small time interval, it is clear that the kinetic energy is transferred across the material not instantaenously, but incrementally. Different materials transfer this energy faster, or slower. Are there any books or papers that look at this in more detail? All I can find are extremely abstract analysis. No equations are offered.

I appreciate any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what you are talking about is material dependent. you won't find much online with regards to time based energy transfer. You could easily do average energy transfer over time, which would just be total energy divided by time in contact. There are extremely delicate tests that would need to be done. at different speeds, each material has a certain elasticity vs force kind of thing. and because you have two different materials colliding it would make it very very hard.
 
Well in that case I'll have to use fake results based on intuition and observation. Since I'm aiming for plausibility, rather than realism, this should suffice.
 
Aren't you talking, basically, about the speed of sound in the materials? That's how fast the forces / energy are propagated through the objects.
 
That's a very good observation.

I may experiment with that idea and see if the results are anything near realistic.

Edit: You are actually 100% correct with that. Many many thanks to you. Now I can finish the theory and start implementing it in code. If any of you are interested in viewing the model in realtime, I'll probably release a demo over the following months.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top