Time Uncertainty: Pulsar Rotation & Atomic Clocks

  • Thread starter Thread starter GingerBread27
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time Uncertainty
AI Thread Summary
Time standards are currently based on atomic clocks, with pulsars emerging as a potential alternative due to their stable rotation rates. A specific pulsar rotates every 1.424 806 448 872 75 2 ms, allowing for precise time calculations. In 21.0 days, this pulsar completes approximately 1.27 billion rotations, taking about 1424.8064 seconds for 1 million rotations. The uncertainty in this time is derived from the rotation period's uncertainty, calculated as 0.02 ms, indicating the actual time could range from 1424.8062 to 1424.8066 seconds. The discussion highlights the importance of measurement precision and pulsar stability in timekeeping.
GingerBread27
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
Time standards are now based on atomic clocks. A promising second standard is based on pulsars, which are rotating neutron stars (highly compact stars consisting only of neutrons). Some rotate at a rate that is highly stable, sending out a radio beacon that sweeps briefly across Earth once with each rotation, like a lighthouse beacon. Suppose a pulsar rotates once every 1.424 806 448 872 75 2 ms, where the trailing 2 indicates the uncertainty in the last decimal place (it does not mean 2 ms).
(a) How many times does the pulsar rotate in 21.0 days?
The answer is 1.27e9
(b) How much time does the pulsar take to rotate 1.0 x 10^6 times? (Give your answer to at least 4 decimal places.)
The answer is 1424.8064 seconds
(c) What is the associated uncertainty of this time?

For this problem I am unsure of how the uncertainty is calculated. I understand parts a and b but not C. Please help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you use upper and lower possible values for the period, calculate the two corresponding answers and make the difference between them ?
 


The uncertainty in time for a pulsar rotation is typically calculated by considering the uncertainty in the measured rotation period. In this case, the uncertainty is represented by the trailing 2 in the given rotation period of 1.424 806 448 872 75 2 ms. This means that the actual rotation period could be anywhere between 1.424 806 448 872 75 0 ms and 1.424 806 448 872 75 4 ms.

To calculate the associated uncertainty in time, we can use the formula:

uncertainty in time = uncertainty in rotation period * number of rotations

For part (c), the uncertainty in time would be:

uncertainty in time = (0.00000000000000002 ms) * (1.0 x 10^6 rotations)

Thus, the associated uncertainty in time would be 0.02 ms. This means that the actual time for 1.0 x 10^6 rotations could be anywhere between 1424.8062 seconds and 1424.8066 seconds.

It is worth noting that this uncertainty may be smaller or larger depending on the precision of the measurements and the stability of the pulsar rotation.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top