Tip current in STM (fractional error problem)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the fractional change in STM tip current based on the given formula and addressing a specific problem involving voltage and tip spacing. The initial attempt to calculate the fractional change in current using a linear approximation is deemed inadequate due to the significant change in current expected. Participants clarify that the relationship between absolute changes in spacing and fractional changes in current is more relevant for larger changes. The work function, initially assumed to be constant, is corrected to depend on voltage, which is crucial for solving the second part of the problem. Overall, understanding the dependence of the work function on voltage is essential for accurately addressing the questions posed.
Ziggy12
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose the STM tip current is given by

i = aV e^{-A\phi^{1/2}s}

a) Derive an expression for the fractional change in tip current as function of fractional change in tip spacing s.

b) If \phi = 4V select a reasonable set of V values so that a 1Å increase in s will cause a factor of 10 decrease in i. (a and A are given)

Homework Equations


Given in problem

The Attempt at a Solution



It's probably very simple but I'm stuck. I'm simply using error formula to get that
\delta i = \frac{\partial i}{\partial s} \delta s = -A\phi^{1/2} \cdot i \cdot \delta s

And then I move out i to the left side to get the fractional change in current.
But that doesn't seem correct. Because then I don't understand how I am supposed to solve b), since the fractional change is independent of V.

I tried other ways as well, but V seems to dissaperar out of the equation anytime I do that.
If anyone has a good idea on how to proceed, it would be welcome.
Thanks
// John[/B]
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot at mai 15 23-55-53.png
    Screenshot at mai 15 23-55-53.png
    31.3 KB · Views: 450
Physics news on Phys.org
If the current changes by a factor 10, your linear approximation doesn't work any more - but then there is no formula relating a fractional change in s to a fractional change in i. There is a formula relating an absolute change in s to a fractional change in i, a more general version of the formula you derived (which only works for small changes in s).
 
Yes I could simply divide the current at two different distances to get

\frac{i(s+\delta s)}{i(s)} = \frac{aVe^{-A\psi^{1/2}(s+\delta s)}}{aVe^{-A\psi^{1/2}s}} = e^{-A\psi^{1/2}\delta s}

but then again, this is independent of the voltage V, so I don't see how I am supposed to solve the second question.

The fractional change in current is the same regardless of the applied voltage (just like for exponential decay where the half life depends only on lambda).
 
Ziggy12 said:
this is independent of the voltage V
Not if ##\phi## (now ##\psi##?) depends on the voltage.
 
Yes sorry about that, it was a typo. Phi is the work function
Well I looked it up and the work function does depend on voltage, so I guess I have to assume that
\phi = (V-4)\hspace{0.1cm}\mathrm{Volts}, and not just 4 Volts as one could think from the problem.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top