Torque and angular accelerationfinding coeff. of friction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the coefficient of friction between an ax and a grindstone, given specific parameters such as the grindstone's dimensions, mass, and angular velocity. The initial calculations for angular acceleration and friction coefficient were incorrect due to the use of the wrong moment of inertia formula for a disk. The correct moment of inertia for a solid disk is I = (MR^2)/2, which led to a revised coefficient of friction of 0.482 instead of the initially calculated 0.964. Participants emphasized the importance of understanding angular momentum and encouraged persistence in mastering the concept. Overall, the thread highlights common pitfalls in physics calculations and the value of peer support in resolving misunderstandings.
offbeatjumi
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The problem states: grindstone in shape of solid disk with diameter .52m and mass 52 kg rotates at 850 rev/min. You press an ax against the rim with normal force 160 N and grindstone comes to rest in 7.5 s. Find coefficient of friction between ax and grindstone.


Homework Equations



The sum of all torques t = I*alpha (angular accel). = alpha*mass*radius^2
avg.angular.accel = (change in angular velocity)/(change in time)
850 rpm = 89 rad/s


The Attempt at a Solution



Using Newton's second law I get the sum of external forces = m*a(tangential) = m*r*alpha = (mu)_k*n
(mu)_k = (mass*radius*alpha)/n = 0.964

The answer in the book is half of the answer I got, 0.482. Where did I miss this? Thanks so much =)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Easy, it seems like your moment of inertia is wrong. If I'm not mistaken you're currently using I=MR^2. Which is the moment of inertia for a thin hoop, not a disk.

A disk has the moment of inertia I= (MR^2)/2... half of what you're using =)
 
Thanks, that was a silly mistake.
I feel completely stupid asking this now but i returned to the question and I don't see how I was using moment of inertia to answer my question.
It just seems that what I did was solve for ang.accel by taking the change in ang.vel. over change in time to get 11.87 rad/s. Then I equated the sum of ext.forces = f(k) = ma(tangential) = m*r*ang.accel.
since f(k) = mu_k*n... so mu_k = (m*r*ang.accel)/n .
Thank you so much, I'm just having a massive mental block.
 
Don't worry about it, angular momentum can be a hard concept but I recommend working hard at it. It will come a lot in physics from now on =)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top