Torque and Power required to turn a plate

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the torque and power required to turn a cast iron table using a locking Geneva mechanism. The user calculated an angular acceleration of 10.08 rad/s² and a moment of inertia of 612.3 kg·m², resulting in a torque of 6172 N·m. However, there is confusion regarding the RPM calculation, as 5.04 rad/s translates to only 48 rpm, not 2888 rpm as initially stated. Additionally, it is noted that the Geneva mechanism's operation involves both acceleration and deceleration phases, which affects the energy calculations. The user is prompted to reconsider their power requirement, as the initial figure of 1867 kW seems excessively high.
superman22x
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have a question. I am working on a small project for class. We have locking Geneva mechanism that turns a table made of cast iron 72* in .5 seconds. The table mass is calculated to be 7300 kg (D=1.25m, h=.350m).

Based on the 72* in .5 seconds, I calculated alpha to be 10.08 rad/s^2. Using I=m*r^2/2, I calculated I to be 612.3. Torque (Nm)=alpha*I=6172N*m.

For power, I used the equation P (Kw) = (Torque*2*pi*rpm)/60,000. And I used alpha*t to solve for the RPM, which ended up being 5.04 rad/s = 2888 rpm. My power required ends up being 1867Kw which seems ridiculously high. Am I calculating this correctly?

Let me know of any other info you need.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't know what a Geneva mechanism was before this thread.

http://www.brockeng.com/mechanism/Geneva.htm


5.04 rad/s is < 60 rotations per minute.
2 pi rad/s is 1 rotation/second = 60 rpm, so I don't know where you got 2888 rpm.

A bigger problem is that the continuously rotating wheel accelerates the slotted wheel for the first 0.25 seconds, but decelerates it in the next 0.25 seconds, and it will probably get most of the kinetic energy from the first 0.25 seconds back. The continuously moving wheel will than have the time that the slotted wheel is stationary to get back to its origional speed.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top