Torque or Force (ball rolling without slipping)?

AI Thread Summary
In a discussion about a uniform ball rolling without slipping on an inclined plane, it was clarified that gravity does not provide torque when considering the ball's center of mass as the axis of rotation, due to zero offset. However, if the point of contact with the inclined plane is used as the axis, gravity does exert torque because there is a perpendicular offset. To find the force of gravity, one can simply multiply the mass of the object by the acceleration due to gravity. The net force and net torque can be calculated by adding all acting forces and torques, respectively. Understanding the relationship between translational and angular acceleration is crucial for analyzing the motion of the ball.
visuality
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
If there is a uniform ball rolling without slipping on an inclined plane, does gravity provide a torque, translational force, or both? I'm just really confused about forces vs. torques i guess?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the ball is uniform, its center of gravity coincides with the rotation axis (the geometrical center), so the gravitational force exerts no torque on the ball.
 
visuality said:
If there is a uniform ball rolling without slipping on an inclined plane, does gravity provide a torque, translational force, or both? I'm just really confused about forces vs. torques i guess?
Whether a force provides a torque depends on the axis of rotation you use. The force of gravity acts as if it were applied at an object's center of mass.

If you use the ball's center of mass as the chosen axis of rotation then there is zero offset between the point of application and the axis of rotation. Zero moment arm means zero torque.

If you use the point where the ball touches the inclined plane (the momentary center of rotation) as the chosen axis then there is a perpendicular offset between the point of application and the chosen axis of rotation. Non-zero force multiplied by non-zero perpendicular offset means non-zero torque.
 
If you use the point where the ball touches the inclined plane (the momentary center of rotation) as the chosen axis then there is a perpendicular offset between the point of application and the chosen axis of rotation. Non-zero force multiplied by non-zero perpendicular offset means non-zero torque.[/QUOTE]

I'm new and not sure how to properly quote the above but jbriggs444 posted that.

Wow I never thought about a momentary center of rotation. I think I understand it now!

This isn't a homework question I'm just trying to understand something, If i wanted to find the force of gravity with F=ma would i have to add the translational acceleration and the angular acceleration? Or do I ignore the translational acceleration? Or something else?
 
visuality said:
This isn't a homework question I'm just trying to understand something, If i wanted to find the force of gravity with F=ma would i have to add the translational acceleration and the angular acceleration? Or do I ignore the translational acceleration? Or something else?
If you already know an object's mass then you can simply multiply by the acceleration of gravity (9.8 meters per second2 on the surface of the earth) to get the force that gravity exerts on it.

The force of gravity can be added to all the other forces acting on an object (do you know how to draw a "free body diagram"?) to determine the net force on the object and therefore its translational acceleration.

The torque from gravity can be added to all the other torques acting on an object to determine the net torque on the object (about the chosen reference axis). This will give you the rate of change of angular momentum. Angular momentum can be split into two parts:

1. The rotation of an object around its center of mass.
2. Movement of the center of mass relative to the chosen axis of rotation. Multiply the object's linear momentum by its mass and by the perpendicular offset from the chosen axis. [technically you are computing a vector cross product]

If you already know the translational acceleration of the object (having done your free body diagram and added up the forces) and you know its offset from the chosen axis then you can calculate the rate of change of part 2. If you know all of the torques then you know how total angular momentum is changing. The difference is the rate at which angular momentum is accumulating in or being drained from the object's rotation. Divide by the moment of inertia and you have angular acceleration.

It can be convenient to choose an axis of rotation that coincides with an object's center of mass. Then the second part of angular momentum is sure to be zero and all you have to worry about is the first part.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
41
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
52
Views
7K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top