Torque required to rotate a circular sector inside a drum

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the torque required to rotate a solid circular sector within a 16’ x 72’ drum by 90 degrees, the moment of inertia of the sector must be determined first. The torque can be calculated using the formula Torque = Moment of Inertia x Angular Acceleration, where angular acceleration is derived from the angular velocity and time. The discussion highlights the need to consider both the moment of inertia of the drum and the circular sector, potentially applying the parallel axis theorem for accurate results. There is also a question regarding whether torque can be simplified to Torque = Force x Radius, with force being the mass times gravitational acceleration. Understanding angular acceleration and its calculation is essential for determining the required torque effectively.
subbby
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
What I have ?
  • Have a 16’ x 72’ rotating drum
  • There is a solid circular sector inside the drum

What I need ?
Want to Calculate the torque required to move that solid circular sector from the intial position to the position shown in attached picture (90 Degrees rotation)


Data :
  • RPM = 10
  • time = 15 seconds


What I have caluted ?
  • Calculated the torque required to rotate the drum using Torque = Moment of Inertia X Alpha where Alpha = angular acceleration

How do I proceed ?
  1. Do I have to calculate the moment of inertia of that solid circular sector and then use the same formula?
  2. But here its not a complete rotation. Its just 90 degrees. So how to arrive at torque to move a mass about an axis only to a certain degree?
  3. Or, Should it be just Torque = Force * Radius ? where force shall be its mass * acceleration due to gravity and radius shall be distance from the drum's rotation axis to the circular sector's center of gravity ?
  4. Does Perpendicular axes theorem or Parallel Axes theorem come into the picture ?
 

Attachments

  • Picture1.jpg
    Picture1.jpg
    18.5 KB · Views: 952
Physics news on Phys.org
You will need to get the total moment of inertia of the drum + circular section. For that you may need the parallel axis theorem.

As for the rotation of the 90 degrees. What is the definition of angular acceleration?
 
rock.freak667 said:
You will need to get the total moment of inertia of the drum + circular section. For that you may need the parallel axis theorem.

As for the rotation of the 90 degrees. What is the definition of angular acceleration?

I am afraid , I didn't understand. My approach was to find the Inertia of both separately and then arrive at their individual torques. Did you mean the same ? Do we need a parallel axis theorem in that ? If yes, could you explain a little more elaborately ?

Angle was taken to be ∏/2.
Therefore, Angular Velocity = (∏/2)*rpm/60 = (∏/2)*10/60=.26 s^(-1)
and Angular acceleration = .26/time = .26/15 =0.0174 s^(-2)

Thanks for your help !
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top