Torque Required to Stop a Rotating Grinding Wheel

  • Thread starter Thread starter needhelp83
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque
AI Thread Summary
The angular momentum of a 2.8 kg cylindrical grinding wheel with a radius of 18 cm rotating at 1500 rpm is calculated to be 7.13 kgm²/s. To stop the wheel in 7 seconds, the average torque required is determined using the angular deceleration formula, resulting in an angular deceleration of 22.44 rad/s². The torque is then calculated using the formula T = I * a, yielding a torque of -1.02 N*m. This negative value indicates the direction of the torque is opposite to the wheel's rotation. Understanding these calculations is essential for effectively stopping a rotating grinding wheel.
needhelp83
Messages
193
Reaction score
0
Problem 2) What is the angular momentum of a 2.8 kg uniform cylindrical grinding wheel of radius 18 cm when rotating at 1500 rpm?
b) How much torque is required to stop it in 7.0 s?


1500 rpm * 2pi rad = 9424.78 rad/m
(9424.78 rad/m) /60 s = 157.08 rad/s

I = 1/2mr2
I = 1/2(2.8 kg)(.18 m)2 = 0.04536 kgm2

L = Iw = (0.04536 kgm2)(157.08 rad/s) = 7.13 kgm2/s

I have determined the angular momentum, but I am unsure of how to determine the torque required to stop it in 7 s

How do you determine this with the torque formula and time involved? Any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The definition of torque is

\mathbf\tau = \frac{d\mathbf{\mathrm L}}{dt}

If you want to change the angular momentum from your value to 0, then the average torque over 7 s most then be?
 
Last edited:
t=(7.13 kgm^2/s)/7.0 s=1.02 kgm^2

Better?
 
hmm...well you know the initial angular velocity ''157.08 rad/s''. I would say you need to calculate the angular deceleration of the spinning wheel from 157.08 r/s to 0 r/s in 7 secs using W(final)=W(initial)+a^t. I make the angular deceleration 22.44 rad s-2.

Then using the formula T=I x a...cha ching !
 
w=w0+at
0=157.08+a(7)
-157.08=7a
a=-22.44 rad/s^2 since stopping

T=Ia
T=0.04536 kgm^2*-22.44
T=-1.02 m*N
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top