Torque transfer via bar - Mechanics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Slickepot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics Torque
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the relationship between torques M1 and M3 in a system of three bars connected by joints. The user is struggling to find a reasonable solution, noting that a small torque at M1 can lead to a large torque at M3 when the angle α is significant. They also suggest that M1 must be considerably larger than M3 when bar L2 is nearly parallel to L3. Additional geometric information and mass considerations are deemed necessary for a comprehensive analysis. The conversation invites further insights and resources related to similar mechanical problems.
Slickepot
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
A friend of mine asked about this problem and I'm wondering if anyone has any advice or tips how to solve it.

1. The problem statement.
(picture attached)
Two bars L1 and L3, connected to two walls, can turn around their fixed wall positions. Torques in those points M1 and M3. The bars are connected via a bar (L2) and joints P and Q (full motion).
What is the connection between the torques around M1 and M3?

3. Attempt at a solution.
All my attempts have seemed unreasonable.
I believe M1 torque can be small to result in a big M3 torque when angle α is large.
Also believe M1 has to be huge compared to M3 when L2 is almost parallell to L3.

All ideas or suggestions how to approuch this problem is welcome. Any similar problems or links to reading material would be great.
Thanks
 

Attachments

  • problem.jpg
    problem.jpg
    8.2 KB · Views: 463
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you need more information on the geometry of the problem; enough information to derive the positions of all 4 joints. Assuming the force acting is gravity, you'll also need masses in there somewhere. Once you have that, diagram the forces acting, and you should be able to find the torque. I'm interested to see the solution though.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top