Total Charge on the Surface of a Drum

AI Thread Summary
To determine the total charge on the surface of a drum with a surface area of 6.25×10−2, the formula Q=EAϵ0 was applied, using the permittivity of free space as 8.85×10−12 and an electric field of 1.30×10^5. When the surface area is increased to 0.124, the same electric field requires recalculating the total charge. The initial confusion stemmed from misinterpreting the phrase "increased to," leading to the incorrect use of the original surface area. Once clarified, the calculation became straightforward, emphasizing the importance of correctly interpreting problem statements.
y0tsubato
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone-This is my first time posting a homework question. I'm a little stuck. I appreciate any help to clue me in the right direction.

Homework Statement



If the drum has a surface area of 6.25×10−2 , what total quantity of charge must reside on the surface of the drum?

I got this right by using Q=EA ϵ0


If the surface area of the drum is increased to 0.124 so that larger sheets of paper can be used, what total quantity of charge is required to produce the same 1.30×105 electric field just above the surface?


Homework Equations



permittivity of free space to be = 8.85×10−12
Q=EA ϵ0
electric field = 1.30*10^5
surface area= 6.25*10^-2


The Attempt at a Solution



(8.85*10^-12)(0.124)(6.25*10^-2)
I used the above because I thought it would be just a matter of multiplying the surface area and dividing by the electric field.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The solution was very easy once I understood. My main problem was interpreting the phrase, "increased to". I kept trying to use the original surface area given.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top