Total Distance of a Velocity Function

  • Thread starter Thread starter 2ltben
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Velocity
2ltben
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An object moves along the x-axis starting off from the initial position x(0)=3.
What is the total distance traveled by the object over the time interval [0,3].


Homework Equations


The integral of the function from 0 to a plus the absolute value of the integral of the function from a to 3, where F(a) = 0.


The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried a number of attempts to factor out any zeroes and, finding none, I resorted to a TI-89, confirming the assumption(not good, seeing as this is an AP Cal AB no-calculator practice test, for a test which is tomorrow morning).

I don't know where I'm going wrong in my procedure, but I keep getting 3. The answer I know is 23/3, and the initial position shouldn't matter a bit since its a definite integral and will only be negated anyway. It should be a simple integral from 0 to 3 of the velocity function with respect to t, but I keep getting the wrong answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
2ltben said:

Homework Statement


An object moves along the x-axis starting off from the initial position x(0)=3.
What is the total distance traveled by the object over the time interval [0,3].


Homework Equations


The integral of the function from 0 to a plus the absolute value of the integral of the function from a to 3, where F(a) = 0.

Can you post the question exactly as it was given to you? Is the velocity of the particle as a function of time given in the question? What's F(a)?
 
Stupid of me to forget the function.
v(t) = 4-t^2
 
The integral from zero to three of the velocity will give you the displacement, which is total net distance from the starting point.

So if you double back on yourself, your distance will continue to increase, but your displacement will decrease. So what you want is the integral of the absolute value of the velocity (note it changes signs once between zero and three)
 
My problem was with the sign change I guess. I refused to touch my graphing calculator and didn't think to graph the function by hand.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top