Total Time for Newton's Law of Gravitation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the total time for an object to fall to Earth using Newton's Law of Gravitation. Participants analyze the equations derived from gravitational force and acceleration, pointing out issues with sign conventions and the dependence of velocity on position. A key point raised is that the velocity should be a function of distance, as it changes during the fall. There are concerns about the integration limits and whether the derived expressions for velocity and time are correct. The conversation emphasizes the importance of careful attention to signs and the relationship between velocity and position in gravitational problems.
Phys_Boi
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the total time, t, that an object takes to reach the surface of the Earth from a distance, D, using the Law of Gravitation: $$F_{g} = \frac{GMm}{x^2}$$

R is radius of Earth
D is distance from surface
R+D is total distance from center of masses

****** One Dimension ******

Homework Equations


F = ma
$$\frac{GMm}{x^2} = ma, a = \frac{GM}{x^2}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


$$\frac{a}{v} = \frac{dv}{dx}$$

$$a dx = v dv \frac{-GM}{x^{2}} dx = v dv$$

$$-GM\int_{R}^{R+D} \frac{1}{x^2} dx = \int_{0}^{v} v dv$$

$$v = \sqrt{2GM(\frac{1}{R+D} - \frac{1}{R})}$$

$$\frac{dx}{dt} = \sqrt{2GM(\frac{1}{R+D} - \frac{1}{R})}$$

$$dt = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2GM(\frac{1}{R+D} - \frac{1}{R})}} dx$$

$$\int_{0}^{t} dt = \int_{R}^{R+D} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2GM(\frac{1}{R+D} - \frac{1}{R})}} dx$$$$t = \frac{D}{\sqrt{2GM(\frac{1}{R+D} - \frac{1}{R})}}$$
Is this the correct solution to the problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A simple cross-check: for D>0, you take the square root of a negative number. That cannot be right.

An unrelated issue: Your speed does not depend on x (the current position) at all. Does that sound realistic?
 
mfb said:
A simple cross-check: for D>0, you take the square root of a negative number. That cannot be right.

An unrelated issue: Your speed does not depend on x (the current position) at all. Does that sound realistic?

a = GM/r^2

If you treat Earth at the x value of 0 then r is a function of x..?

r(x) = x?

I do understand D>0 causing a problem, but I don't know where I went wrong.
 
R is the constant radius of Earth.

What is r now? The same as x?
Phys_Boi said:
I do understand D>0 causing a problem, but I don't know where I went wrong.
Probably a sign error somewhere. Using conservation of energy, you can directly find v(x) and avoid a few steps.
 
mfb said:
R is the constant radius of Earth.

What is r now? The same as x?
Probably a sign error somewhere. Using conservation of energy, you can directly find v(x) and avoid a few steps.
At time = 0, r = R + D.

I was going to use conservation of energy, but hesitated due to the fact that you use "g", an approximation.
In the first integral, would you use "R" as the top bound instead of "R + D"?
 
Phys_Boi said:

Homework Statement


Find the total time, t, that an object takes to reach the surface of the Earth from a distance, D, using the Law of Gravitation: $$F_{g} = \frac{GMm}{x^2}$$

R is radius of Earth
D is distance from surface
R+D is total distance from center of masses

****** One Dimension ******

Homework Equations


F = ma
$$\frac{GMm}{x^2} = ma, a = \frac{GM}{x^2}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


$$\frac{a}{v} = \frac{dv}{dx}$$

$$a dx = v dv$$

$$\frac{-GM}{x^{2}} dx = v dv$$
Why'd you throw the minus sign in? I'm not saying it's wrong, but above you wrote ##a = \frac{GM}{x^2}##.

$$-GM\int_{R}^{R+D} \frac{1}{x^2} dx = \int_{0}^{v} v dv$$
The bottom limit of the integral is where you're starting from, and the top limit is where you're ending at. That's the convention you followed on the velocity integral, but you did it backwards on the LHS.

Note that if you say your end point is at ##x=R##, the ##v## you find is ##v(x=R)##, the speed when the object is at a distance ##R##. Is that what you want to find?
 
vela said:
Why'd you throw the minus sign in? I'm not saying it's wrong, but above you wrote ##a = \frac{GM}{x^2}##.


The bottom limit of the integral is where you're starting from, and the top limit is where you're ending at. That's the convention you followed on the velocity integral, but you did it backwards on the LHS.

Note that if you say your end point is at ##x=R##, the ##v## you find is ##v(x=R)##, the speed when the object is at a distance ##R##. Is that what you want to find?

I added the negative just because the drawing that I drew had the object moving left.

I'm trying to find the total time it takes the object to move from (x = R+D) to (x=R).

I realized the mistake and the new equations are:
$$-GM\int_{R+D}^{R} \frac{1}{x^{2}} dx = \frac{v^{2}}{2}$$

$$v = \sqrt{2GM(\frac{1}{R} - \frac{1}{R+D})} = \frac{\mathrm{dx} }{\mathrm{dt}}$$

$$t = \int_{R+D}^{R} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2GM(\frac{1}{R} - \frac{1}{R+D})}} dx$$

$$t = \frac{D}{\sqrt{2GM(\frac{1}{R} - \frac{1}{R+D})}}$$
 
As mfb noted earlier, your expression for ##v## doesn't depend on ##x##. It's a constant, so you might notice your last calculation amounts to time = distance/speed (with a sign error).

In this problem, you need to pay a bit more attention to the signs. Which way does the velocity point as the object nears the Earth?
 
vela said:
As mfb noted earlier, your expression for ##v## doesn't depend on ##x##. It's a constant, so you might notice your last calculation amounts to time = distance/speed (with a sign error).

In this problem, you need to pay a bit more attention to the signs. Which way does the velocity point as the object nears the Earth?
Velocity is a function of x. As the object starts off (with a large x value) the velocity is very small. However, as the object gets closer to Earth, the velocity is very great...

The object is traveling to the left, toward the Earth.
 
  • #10
Phys_Boi said:
Velocity is a function of x. As the object starts off (with a large x value) the velocity is very small. However, as the object gets closer to Earth, the velocity is very great...
Right, so your expression for ##v## should be a function of ##x##. Yours isn't.

The object is traveling to the left, toward the Earth.
According to your sign convention, did you pick the right sign for ##v## when you solved ##v^2=##...?
 
  • #11
vela said:
Right, so your expression for ##v## should be a function of ##x##. Yours isn't.According to your sign convention, did you pick the right sign for ##v## when you solved ##v^2=##...?
I understand now... However, I don't know how to make it a function of x.

And is this right?
$$\frac{-v^{2}}{2}$$
 
  • #12
Phys_Boi said:
I understand now... However, I don't know how to make it a function of x.
Think about what I said in post 6.

And is this right?
$$\frac{-v^{2}}{2}$$
No. If you had the equation, ##x^2 = 4##, there are two solutions, right? Same thing here. You have ##v^2=\text{something}##. Make sure you pick the right solution.
 
  • #13
vela said:
Think about what I said in post 6.No. If you had the equation, ##x^2 = 4##, there are two solutions, right? Same thing here. You have ##v^2=\text{something}##. Make sure you pick the right solution.

I'm sorry, I still don't understand
 
  • #14
If you know that x is negative, and x2=4, what is x?
 
Back
Top