Trace and its square of mixed state density operator using integral

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the properties of the mixed state density operator, specifically that the trace of the mixed state, tr(ρ_mixed), equals 1, while the trace of its square, tr(ρ_mixed²), is less than 1. The mixed state density operator is defined as ρ_mixed = (1/2π)∫₀²π dα ρ(ψ). The calculations presented show that tr(ρ_mixed) simplifies correctly to 1, but the attempt to compute tr(ρ_mixed²) reveals an error in the reasoning. The mistake lies in the assumption that the square of the trace behaves the same way as the trace itself, indicating a misunderstanding of the properties of mixed states. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurate calculations in quantum mechanics.
xyver
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I want to show that
tr\left(\hat{\rho}_{mixed}\right)=1
tr\left(\hat{\rho}_{mixed}^{2}\right)<1
when
<br /> \hat{\rho}_{mixed}=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{0}^{2\pi}d \alpha \hat{\rho}(\psi)<br />

Homework Equations


tr\left(\psi\right)= \sum_{n}\langle n|\psi|n\rangle
\hat{\rho}=\sum_{a}\omega_{a}|\psi\rangle\langle \psi|


The Attempt at a Solution


\hat{\rho}_{mixed}=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{0}^{2\pi}d\alpha\hat{\rho}(\psi)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\left[\alpha\right]_{0}^{2\pi}\hat{\rho}(\psi)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\left[2\pi-0\right]\hat{\rho}(\psi)=\hat{\rho}(\psi)<br />
tr\left(\hat{\rho}_{mixed}(\psi)\right)= tr\left( \hat{\rho}(\psi)\right)=\sum_{n}\sum_{a}\langle n| \underbrace{\psi_{a}\rangle\langle\psi_{a}}_{=1}|n\rangle=\sum_{n}\langle n|n\rangle=1
tr \left(\hat{\rho}_{mixed}^{2}( \psi)\right)= tr\left( \hat{\rho}^{2}(\psi)\right)= tr\left(\hat{\rho}(\psi) \cdot \hat{\rho}(\psi)\right) = \sum_{n}\sum_{a,b} \langle n| \underbrace{\psi_{a}\rangle \langle\psi_{a}}_{=1}| \underbrace{\psi_{b} \rangle\langle\psi_{b}}_{=1}|n\rangle= \sum_{n}\langle n|n\rangle= 1

That`s not correct, at least not the square of the trace.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where is my mistake?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top