Tracing the Roots of Nuclear Physics: Experiments by Early Pioneers

Azael
Messages
257
Reaction score
1
Where can all the classic papers by the experimentalists that layed the foundation for nuclear physics be found?:confused:

Rutherford, joliot-curie, fermi, lawrence, Hahn ect.
Im very interested in reading exactly how they setup there experiments, the conclusions they drew and so on.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
there is a russian site having translations (to english) of the earlier papers. You can find Dirac papers in the Royal Society journals, free until december, and surely a bunch of references to experimentalists there. You can find old french and european journals for free in Gallica.

I do not remember the links. You could try the "online" tag in physcomments.org
 
arivero said:
there is a russian site having translations (to english) of the earlier papers. You can find Dirac papers in the Royal Society journals, free until december, and surely a bunch of references to experimentalists there. You can find old french and european journals for free in Gallica.

I do not remember the links. You could try the "online" tag in physcomments.org


Thanks :) Il try there
 
arivero said:
You can find Dirac papers in the Royal Society journals, free until december,
I do not remember the links. You could try the "online" tag in physcomments.org

http://www.pubs.royalsoc.ac.uk/index.cfm?page=1373

Still the best work to study the Dirac equation are the papers in
which Dirac introduced it:

The Quantum Theory of the Electron.
vol 117, 1 February 1928, pp.610-24
The Quantum Theory of the Electron II
vol 118, 1 March 1928, pp. 351-61

Dirac's start in quantum mechanics is where he, after reading
Heisenberg's paper on Matrix mechanics, introduces the Poisson
brackets from classical dynamics into quantum mechanics:

The fundamental equations of quantum mechanics.
vol 109, 1 December 1925, pp. 642-53

Hard to read without Heisenberg's work though. One might use:
The physical interpretation of the quantum theory:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0486601137/?tag=pfamazon01-20
for this, see the appendix (which is half the book) Other famous Dirac papers where published elsewhere:
The lagrangian in Quantum Mechanics:
Physikalische Zeitschrift der Sowjetunion, vol 3, n0.1, pp 64-72
The theory of magnetic poles:
The Physical Review, vol 74, no.7, 1 October 1948, pp. 817-30Regards, Hans
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Classic Papers:

Search here by author for European classics (I've seen papers by Lorentz, Curie, Arrhenius, van der Waals, de Haas, Onnes, Zeeman)
http://www.knaw.nl/cfdata/digital_library/output/proceedings/works.cfm
(thanks to Astronuc for that reference)

For another 18 days, the Royal Society's digital archive is FREE!
http://www.journals.royalsoc.ac.uk/(yuvxwsm1u4troaijxznq4x45)/app/home/main.asp?referrer=default

Interviews and citations for PRL's Top Ten
http://www.aps.org/apsnews/topten.cfm

Physical Review gave free access to a collection of classics during their centennial, a couple years ago (Zz linked it in a thread here). I think that access has since been closed down.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top