Tracing the U(235,92) + Neutron Process to Final Stable Nuclei

Amith2006
Messages
416
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


1) In a sequential process, U(235,92) plus a neutron forms the compound nucleus [U(236,92)]* which then fissions; the fissions then produces decays. If the initial fission fragments are Ba(143,56) and Kr(90,36), illustrate a process leading to the final stable nuclei.



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I have the solution, but I am unable to understand it. They say that both Barium and Krypton undergoes negative beta decays 4 times.
The initial process is:
U(235,92) + 1 neutron ---> [U(236,92)]* ---> Ba(143,56) + Kr(90,36) + 3 neutrons

The final reaction is:
U(235,92) + 1 neutron ---> [U(236,92)]* ---> Nd(143,60) + Zr(90,40) + 3 neutrons + 8
electrons + 8 antineutrinos
Why can’t alpha decay take place instead of beta decay? I think it is because the former takes place in isotopes having mass number greater than 200? Also, in such questions how do they say that beta decay takes place only 4 times after which a stable nuclei is obtained?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
this is more of a conceptual question I think. and the question is asking why is it beta and not alpha or anything else.
first of all, elements with large mass numbers when compared to their atomic numbers (when Z>2*A) tend to go under beta decay.
this is perhaps the answer they are looking for, but this is not the only reason and it cannot be.
the nature of the element also plays an important role on the type of decay. some rare elements might go under alpha in tihs case.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top