Train Collision Stopping distance Problem

AI Thread Summary
Two trains are approaching each other at speeds of 74 km/h and 148 km/h, with a distance of 938 m between them when the brakes are applied, decelerating at 1.0 m/s². Calculations show that the first train requires 211.275 m to stop, while the second needs 845.057 m, totaling 1056.332 m, indicating a collision will occur. For the third part of the problem, the challenge lies in determining a single deceleration rate that allows both trains to stop within the 938 m distance. The discussion suggests using the equation V² - Vo² = 2a(X - Xo) to find the necessary deceleration for each train individually. The key issue is understanding how to apply the formula correctly to find a common deceleration that prevents a collision.
SharkFin39
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two trains, one traveling at 74.00 km/h and the other at 148.00 km/h, are headed toward one another along a straight, level track. When they are 938 m apart, each engineer sees the other's train and applies the brakes. The brakes decelerate each train at the rate of 1.0 m/s2. Is there a collision? What distance do the trains need to allow between them to stop at this acceleration? What acceleration do the two trains need to have to stop exactly in a distance of 938 m?


Homework Equations



V^2 - Vo^2 = 2a(X-Xo) (this is what I used to solve parts 1 and 2)

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I had no problem with the first two parts of the question. Using the above formula I determined that the first train needed 211.275m to stop, and the second needed 845.057m to stop. They needed a total distance of 1056.332m to stop, therefore there was a collision.

My question is how would I go about solving the third part of the question. The question calls for a single answer in m/s^2. Otherwise, I would've just divided the 938m by 2, and solved for two separate accelerations. I think I'm actually more stumped by the question than the calculations. If this makes sense to anyone, I'd really appreciate some guidance. Thank you in advance for you assistance.

SharkFin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use s=ut + 1/2 at^2 for each train and the 's' from both trains must add to 938m
 
For the last question, consider just one train at a time. If the train 1 traveling at 74kmph was 938m away from some point (call it A), what should its deceleration be so that it comes to rest at A. Similarly for the other train.
 
neutrino said:
For the last question, consider just one train at a time. If the train 1 traveling at 74kmph was 938m away from some point (call it A), what should its deceleration be so that it comes to rest at A. Similarly for the other train.

This won't work, for two reasons. (1) He is looking for a single number, not two numbers, and (2) the trains will crash.The two trains have some common breaking deceleration. Call this "a". Train 1 will come to a stop after traveling some distance d1, train 2 after some distance d2. You don't know what d1 and d2 are, but you do know what they are in terms of "a" and you do know their sum.
 
V^2 - Vo^2 = 2a(X-Xo) (this is what I used to solve parts 1 and 2)
Sharkfin. I have a very similar problem. Almost exactly but can not get your answers for x of each train's distance to stop to save my life. You converted km/h to m/s I'm pretty sure. What did u plug into each variable for that equation. a=-1.0, V=0?, Vo=74 km/h? (convert), X=?, Xo=?. Are u using X=938, Xo=unknown, V=0 (bc it stopped), Vo=20.56 m/s (after conversion), Having a hard time figuring out where the initial variables plug into the equation
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top