Trajectory of a rigid body with two wheel with different speed

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the trajectory of a rigid body with two wheels rotating at different speeds without skidding. The user proposes that each wheel follows a circular path around a common center, with derived formulas for the distances from the center to each wheel based on their speeds and the distance between them. The calculations suggest that if one wheel is stationary, the other will trace a circle around it, supporting the proposed equations. Additional insights confirm the validity of the equations, even under varying conditions, such as one wheel moving in the opposite direction. The conversation seeks further rigorous demonstrations of the trajectory concept.
Rossi88
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

first sorry for my bad English, I am more skilled to read than to write in English
I don't know if this is the right section for this topic.

The problem is described in the title of the topic.
My guess is that each of the two wheels goes on with circular trajectory around a same center. There isn't skidding of the wheels.
If the distance between the wheel is D, the speed of the slowest wheel is v1 and the speed of the other wheel is v2 (v1 and v2 is the linear speed), then:

R1=v1*d/(v2-v1)

is the distance between the centre and the slowest wheel, and of course the distance between the centre and the other wheel is

R2=v1*D/(v2-v1)+D=v2*D/(v2-v1)


is my guess correct?
My guess is based on time that each wheel needs to do the circle, and this time needs to be equal for the two wheel.
It seems to be correct, if one wheel is stopped (for example v1=0) the other does a circle around it, infact for the above formulas:
R1=0
R2=D
if the speed of the two wheel are the same
R1->inf
R2->inf

There is someone that knows an other demonstration more rigorous of this?
I attended a mechanical course some year ago, with euler's formula, lagrange and other but I don't remember much and I don't know how to determine the trajectory of a rigid body with two point with different speed.

A special thank to anyone that will help me.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equations look good to me, even letting v1=-v2, means R1 and R2 = D/2, which looks good.
 
elegysix said:
Your equations look good to me, even letting v1=-v2, means R1 and R2 = D/2, which looks good.

your observation is interesting, and is a further proof of the goodness of the equations.
Thank you.

if someone other have a demonstration I will be grateful to him
 
I think if you took a toy car and put two different size wheels on either side, It would trace the outside of a circle depending on the initial velocity you give it. As long as the wheels are on the same axle that is.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top