Transfer function to state space manually

AI Thread Summary
To convert a transfer function to state space form manually, one can start with the transfer function G(s) = 10/(s+10). For a first-order system, there is typically a unique state space representation, while higher-order systems can yield multiple representations, some of which may be completely observable or controllable. The conversion involves expressing the system in terms of state variables and their derivatives, leading to equations like x'(t) = -10x(t) + 10u(t) and y(t) = x(t). The process ensures that if there are no hidden pole/zero cancellations, the system can be both observable and controllable. Understanding these principles is crucial for effective system modeling and analysis.
raedbenz
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, how can i convert a transfer function to state space form by hand:
e.g.;
G=10/(s+10)
??
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
for a 1st order system, there about only one state space representation. but for higher order, there will be many different state space representations for the same transfer function. some will be completely observable, some completely controllable. if there are no hidden pole/zero cancellations, then i think you can have it both completely observable and controllable.

anyway (your textbook should say this):

Y(s)/U(s) = G(s) = \frac{10}{s+10} = \frac{10 s^{-1}}{1+10 s^(-1)}

10 s^{-1} Y(s) + Y(s) = 10 s^{-1} U(s)

Y(s) = -10 s^{-1} Y(s) + 10 s^{-1} U(s)

state:

X(s) = Y(s)

sX(s) = -10 X(s) + 10 U(s)

x'(t) = -10 x(t) + 10 u(t)

y(t)= x(t)
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
61
Views
5K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
184
Back
Top