Transfer functions and cut off frequency

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the transfer function H(jw) for an RC parallel circuit with a resistor followed by a capacitor. The initial attempt at a solution suggests H(jw) = jw/(jw + 1/RC), but further clarification is needed on circuit descriptions and diagrams. Participants emphasize the importance of providing detailed derivations and intermediate steps to validate the transfer function calculations. There is also a suggestion that actual component values may be required for final results. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of circuit analysis and the need for clear communication in problem-solving.
nikki92
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


RC parallel circuit with the resistor first and the capacitor next.

find the transfer function H(jw)

resistor first then capacitor

transfer function of a circuit with resister serial then capacitor and resister parallel


I have absolutely no background in circuits but need to understand this material to take a communications course.

The Attempt at a Solution



RC parallel would it be H(jw) = jw/(jw + 1/RC)

the other
H(jw) = jw(c/(R_s +c))/(jw + R_sC /(R_S+c)R
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your question is a bit vague in the way of the circuit descriptions. It would much better if you could upload a diagram or two.
 
IMG_1809.jpg


H(jw)=jw/(jw+1/RC)

IMG_1810.jpg


H(jw) = jw[C/(Rs+c)]/ {jw +Rsc/[(Rs+c)R ]}

IMG_1811.jpg


H(jw) = {[1/(R1C1)] - w^2 } / {1/(R1C1) - w^2 +jw/(R2C1)}
 
Okay, that's better.

In the first diagram I interpret the output to be the capacitor current Io(t), even though the diagram is missing the current arrow on that branch. Traditionally the "o" subscript indicates an output. Your H(jw) would be correct for taking i2 as the output though.

The others are a bit more complicated to evaluate since there are several ways to simplify the expressions, and I'm not keen on spending time to see if yours can proven as identities of my own results. So. Perhaps if you could provide a bit more detail about your derivations (show and explain some intermediate steps) that would be excellent.

One thing I notice is that they have provided actual component values, so for final results they may be expecting you to plug them in for final results.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
24K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top