Transform Metric to Flat Spacetime: Advice & Hints

  • Thread starter Thread starter PeroK
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metric
PeroK
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2024 Award
Messages
29,093
Reaction score
20,717

Homework Statement



I have the metric ##ds^2 = -X^2dT^2 + dX^2##

Find the coordinate transformation that reduces the metric to that of flat spacetime:

##ds^2 = -dt^2 + dx^2##

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not sure there's a systematic way to solve this (or in general to show that a metric is just flat spacetime in a different coordinate system). And I've not been able to guess a suitable transformation.

Any advice or hints on a technique or an inspired guess?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PeroK said:

Homework Statement



I have the metric ##ds^2 = -X^2dT^2 + dX^2##

Find the coordinate transformation that reduces the metric to that of flat spacetime:

##ds^2 = -dt^2 + dx^2##

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not sure there's a systematic way to solve this (or in general to show that a metric is just flat spacetime in a different coordinate system). And I've not been able to guess a suitable transformation.

Any advice or hints on a technique or an inspired guess?
Separation of variables (kind of)?
##t=Xf(T)##
##x=Xh(T)##
Using the transformation rules for the metric tensor leads to the expected result, but I'm not sure it is the quickest (smartest) way to do it.
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
Samy_A said:
Separation of variables (kind of)?
##t=Xf(T)##
##x=Xh(T)##
Using the transformation rules for the metric tensor leads to the expected result, but I'm not sure it is the quickest (smartest) way to do it.

Yes, of course. I didn't think to try that way round. I was working with ##T = T(t,x)## etc. Many thanks.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top