Transformation from cartesian to cylindrical coordinates

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the transformation from Cartesian to cylindrical coordinates as outlined in Godel's 1949 paper on Closed Time-like Curves (CTCs). The user is attempting to confirm the transformation using Maple but encounters issues with their calculations, specifically with the differentiation of the line element. The correct line element in cylindrical coordinates is established as dS^2 = 4a^2[dt^2 - dr^2 - dy^2 + (\sinh^4(r) - \sinh^2(r))d\phi^2 + 2\sqrt{2}\sinh^2(r)d\phi dt]. The user identifies a problem with their expression for dx_0 and seeks assistance in verifying their differentiation process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential geometry and line elements
  • Familiarity with cylindrical coordinates and their transformations
  • Proficiency in using Maple for symbolic computation
  • Knowledge of hyperbolic functions and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the differentiation techniques in differential geometry
  • Study the properties of hyperbolic functions in transformations
  • Learn advanced Maple commands for simplifying expressions
  • Explore Godel's theories on Closed Time-like Curves for deeper context
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, mathematicians focusing on differential geometry, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of time travel theories.

Otacon23
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm trying to get to grips with Godel's 1949 Paper on Closed Time-like Curves (CTCs). Currently I'm trying to confirm his transformation to cylindrical coordinates using maple but seem to keep getting the wrong answer.

Homework Equations



The line element in cartesian coordinates is: ##dS^2 = a^2[dx_0^2-dx_1^2+\frac{1}{2}##e##2x_1####dx_2^2-dx_3^2+2##e##x_1####dx_0dx_2]## using the following substitutions:
##e####x_1#### = \cosh(2r) + \cos(\phi)\sinh(2r)##
##x_2e####x_1####= \sqrt{2}\sin(\phi)sinh(2r)##
##\tan(\frac{\phi}{2} + \frac{x_0 - 2t}{2\sqrt{2}}) = e####2r####\tan(\frac{\phi}{2})##
##x_3 = 2y##
I need to show that the line element is ##dS^2 = 4a^2[dt^2 -dr^2 -dy^2 + (\sinh^4(r) - \sinh^2(r))d\phi^2 + 2\sqrt{2}\sinh^2(r)d\phi dt]##

The Attempt at a Solution



I started by differentiating these four equations to obtain expressions for ##dx_0, dx_1, dx_2, dx_3##

## dx_0 = 2e####-2r####\sqrt{2}cos^2(\frac{\phi}{2} + \frac{x_0 - 2t}{2\sqrt{2}})(\frac{1}{2}\sec^2(\frac{\phi}{2})d\phi - 2\tan(\frac{\phi}{2})dr) + 2dt - \sqrt{2}d\phi##

##dx_1 =2e####-x_1####(sinh(2r) + cos(\phi)cosh(2r))dr - e####-x_1####sin(\phi)sinh(2r)d\phi##

##dx_2 = e####-x_1####sinh(2r)(\sqrt{2}cos(\phi) +x_2\sin(\phi))d\phi + 2e####-x_1####(\sqrt{2}sin(\phi)\cosh(2r)-x_2\sinh(2r)-cos(\phi)\cosh(2r))dr##

##dx_3 = 2dy##

In maple I then defined the variable 'X' to be
##X := a^2[dx_0^2-dx_1^2+\frac{1}{2}##e##2x_1####dx_2^2-dx_3^2+2##e##x_1####dx_0dx_2] - 4a^2[dt^2 -dr^2 -dy^2 + (\sinh^4(r) - \sinh^2(r))d\phi^2 + 2\sqrt{2}\sinh^2(r)d\phi dt];##

Then defined 'XX' to be
##XX:=(subs(dx_0 = ..., dx_1 = ..., dx_2 = ..., dx_3 = ..., X));##
Then simplified the result hoping it to be zero.
##simplify(XX);##
Instead of zero I receive 4 pages or so of trash, so basically can anyone point out where or how I have gone askew?

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I tried letting all the variables equal to a random constant and managed to get ##'XX'## to equal 0. It seems that I get a non-zero value of ##'XX'## whenever I let any of ##t, r, \phi## remain a variable and not a constant, which leads me to believe that my substitution and hence my differentiation is incorrect. If anyone has the time to double check any of my differentiations I would really appreciate it!
Maths Love xx
 
Narrowed it down to there just being a problem with ##dx_0##
Anyone care to look?
 
Otacon23 said:
## dx_0 = 2e####-2r####\sqrt{2}cos^2(\frac{\phi}{2} + \frac{x_0 - 2t}{2\sqrt{2}})(\frac{1}{2}\sec^2(\frac{\phi}{2})d\phi - 2\tan(\frac{\phi}{2})dr) + 2dt - \sqrt{2}d\phi##
You have an x0 on the RHS side there. Assuming you want rid of that, I get
## dx_0 = 2dt - \sqrt{2}d\phi + \sqrt{2}\frac{2 sin(\phi)dr+d\phi}{e^{-2r}cos^2(\phi/2)+e^{2r}sin^2(\phi/2))} ##
The denominator could also be written ## cosh(2r) - sinh(2r)cos(\phi) ##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K