Transformation of a vector operator

andre220
Messages
75
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Calculate the result of the transformation of the vector operator \hat{V_{y}} by rotation \hat{R_{x}} around an angle \alpha.



Homework Equations



I believe that \hat{R_{x}} = \begin{pmatrix} 1& 0& 0\\ 0& cos\alpha & -sin\alpha \\ 0 & sin\alpha & cos\alpha \end{pmatrix}

Not sure if the fact that it is an operator makes any difference here...

The Attempt at a Solution



So at first glance it seems that the solution should be something like the calculation of \hat{V_y} \hat{R_x}, however I am not sure since they are operators. If this is correct then would the solution be calculated by using arbitrary components of \hat{V_y}? If this is completely wrong, what is a better way to look at this problem?

Thank you for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's start with a more basic question: given a rotation

R_{x} = \begin{pmatrix} 1& 0& 0\\ 0& cos\alpha & -sin\alpha \\ 0 & sin\alpha & cos\alpha \end{pmatrix},

what is the corresponding operator \hat{R_{x}} that acts on states (kets or wave functions)?
 
I guess that is what I am most confused about here. Is how does R_x come correspond to \hat{R_x}.

So some thing like this: V_i \to R_{ij} V_j


If I had to make an educated guess here I would say it would transform on the ket \mid \psi \rangle in this way: \langle \psi \mid V_i \mid \psi \rangle \to R_{ij} \langle \psi \mid V_j \mid \psi \rangle.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top