Transforming an Inverse Relationship Graph into a Linear One: Tips and Tricks

  • Thread starter Thread starter mushroom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graphing
AI Thread Summary
To transform an inverse relationship graph (y = k/x) into a linear one, plot y against 1/x instead of x, resulting in a straight line graph represented by y = k(1/x). This approach creates a directly proportional relationship, allowing for easier analysis. Additionally, graphing log(y) against log(x) will yield a straight line, which can be facilitated using log-log graph paper. This method provides a clear visualization of the relationship between the variables. Utilizing these techniques will help achieve the desired linear representation of the data.
mushroom
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hi guys this is my first time posting on here hope it's in the right section
well here's my problem i have a ploted an inverse relationship ( hyperbole ) on my graph now my teacher wants me to make the graph into a linear relationship, he also gave us an equation which is y=k/x, now how would i go about doing this? i will provide more information if this is not enough...

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome mushroom,

I will try to answer your question.

The relationship between the variables of a linear graph, say u,v, is of the form

v = grad\ u + v_o

where grad is the gradient of the graph and v_o is the value of the dependent variable when the independent variable is zero. That is v when u=0.

A special case arises when v_o = 0 then whe have

v = grad\ u

a directly proportional relationship with a straight line graph through the origin.

By plotting your y values against u = \frac{1}{x} values the relationship take on the same form:

y = grad\ u

so that we get a directly proportional relationship between y and \frac{1}{x}.
 
Last edited:
Andrevdh's point was, that if y= k/x so that plotting y against x gives a hyperbola, then plotting y against 1/x rather than x (so the X-coordinate of the point is 1/x rather than x) gives the straight line graph y= kX.

I would also recommend noting that log(y)= log(k/x)= log(k)- log(x). If you graph log(y) against log(x) you get a straight line. In fact it used to be (probably still is, but computers have changed so many things) possible to buy "log-log" graph paper which was ruled so that marking "3" on an axis you were actually marking "log(3)".
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top