Engineering Transient response of RL Circuit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the expression for current in an RL circuit after a switch is changed. The initial current is identified as 3 amps, and the final answer is confirmed to be 3e^(20t) Amps. There is confusion regarding the behavior of the inductor and the presence of a controlled source, which complicates the circuit analysis. Participants suggest using Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) and differential equations to solve the problem, noting that the controlled source alters the circuit's energy dynamics. The conversation concludes with clarification that the controlled source is a voltage source, resolving the earlier confusion about its configuration.
Cetullah
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the expression of the current "i" by terms of time.
The answer is 3e^(20t) Amps

Homework Equations



i(t)=I_final+(I_initial-I_final)*e^(-t/τ)

The Attempt at a Solution


I have found the initial current as 3 amps. However, after the switch had been changed for too long, I m not sure about the way how the inductor behaves. Will it be a short circuit? If so, there is some problem about the loop on the right, like 8ix-6ix=0
Can the dependant source behave like that? Also I have problem about finding the time constant, I find 1/τ as 60.

Thanks for your help!
 

Attachments

  • Foto?raf-0054.jpg
    Foto?raf-0054.jpg
    14.5 KB · Views: 646
Physics news on Phys.org
The controlled source is going to throw a monkey wrench into a simplistic solution involving time constants based upon the passive components alone. The controlled source will alter the energy available in the circuit over time, so it won't behave like a typical passive RL circuit.

I suggest writing the differential equation for the loop based on KVL. You know the initial value of the current. (A very easy way is to us the Laplace domain/transform method).

I can confirm that the given answer is correct.
 
Hard to read your image, but it looks like the controlled current source is 8 i_x and it's in series with i_x. That unfortunately is impossible.
 
rude man said:
Hard to read your image, but it looks like the controlled current source is 8 i_x and it's in series with i_x. That unfortunately is impossible.

Not desirable perhaps, but not impossible to solve. It means that there will be no steady state for as t → ∞. Sort of analogous to an amplifier with positive feedback. Take look at the proposed solution, and in particular, the sign of the exponent.
 
gneill said:
Not desirable perhaps, but not impossible to solve. It means that there will be no steady state for as t → ∞. Sort of analogous to an amplifier with positive feedback. Take look at the proposed solution, and in particular, the sign of the exponent.

Are you confirming that the 8i_x source is in series with i_x? 'Cause if you are, that is impossible.
 
rude man said:
Are you confirming that the 8i_x source is in series with i_x? 'Cause if you are, that is impossible.

I am confirming that the given solution can be derived from the circuit as shown.

EDIT: It just occurred to me that perhaps there is some confusion about the 8ix controlled source being in series with the ix current. That source is a controlled VOLTAGE source, so there is no contradiction in the math.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
824
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
12K
Back
Top