Transition Moments and Selection Rules

Rambro323
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
My instructor was talking about allowed transitions for IR spectroscopy and how you can predict them relatively well using PIB wavefunctions. It was stated that you could solve for the probability of a transition moment to determine if a transition is forbidden or not.

<μ>=∫ΨfμΨidτ where μ=x

So for fun I plugged in μ=x2 and started getting alternating negative and positive, whose absolute values decreased as the difference between i and f increased. The integral value never reached zero.

I'm mostly wondering what a negative transition moment means, my gut tells me emission. And can there be any transitions which are forbidden if the integral value is never zero?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rambro323 said:
My instructor was talking about allowed transitions for IR spectroscopy and how you can predict them relatively well using PIB wavefunctions.
The harmonic oscillator is generally speaking a better model.

Rambro323 said:
So for fun I plugged in μ=x2
Note that this not represent a dipole moment, so you have to be careful not to carry any interpretation too far.

Rambro323 said:
I'm mostly wondering what a negative transition moment means, my gut tells me emission.
The sign depends on a purely arbitray choice of phase or orientation of the coordinate system. It has nothing to do with emission. The transition rate is proportional to ##|\langle\mu\rangle|^2##.

Rambro323 said:
And can there be any transitions which are forbidden if the integral value is never zero?
The definition of an electric-dipole forbidden transition is one for which ##|\langle\mu\rangle|^2 = 0##, otherwise it is allowed. There can be other processes (electric quadrupole, magnetic dipole, etc.) that allow for transitions, but the corresponding transition rates are generally orders of magnitude smaller, and can be neglected when doing ordinary IR spectroscopy.
 
Thank you!

I didn't use harmonic oscillator mostly because I didn't want to deal with its wavefunctions cause that would have taken me more time. So then that means that all transitions are allowed for particle in a box when μ=x2 until |μ|2 gets arbitrarily close to zero. Kind of weird.
 
Rambro323 said:
So then that means that all transitions are allowed for particle in a box when μ=x2 until |μ|2 gets arbitrarily close to zero. Kind of weird.
As I said previously, μ=x2 does not correspond to a dipole moment, therefore you cannot conclude anything about allowed or forbidden transitions.
 
Rambro323 said:
So then that means that all transitions are allowed for particle in a box when μ=x2 until |μ|2 gets arbitrarily close to zero. Kind of weird.

At least, now I know what you meant with PIB wavefunctions.
For a particle in a box, even if you take mu=x, you at least get transitions between all even and odd eigenfunctions. However, the size of the matrix elements decays rapidly with the difference of quantum numbers.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top