Transitional Equilibrium: Tension Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the tension in three ropes supporting a 200 Newton box. The user initially set up equations based on the sum of forces in the x and y directions but encountered issues with the values for T1 and T2 not equating to zero. After receiving guidance, the user re-evaluated their calculations and confirmed that their answers were correct upon rechecking. The conversation highlights the importance of accuracy in applying trigonometric functions and checking the results against the original equations. Ultimately, the user resolved their confusion and thanked the contributors for their assistance.
CLeSure
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A box with a weight of 200 Newtons is hung from ropes as shown below. Calculate the tension in each of the three ropes supporting the box.

tension.jpg



Homework Equations



\SigmaF_{x}=0
\SigmaF_{y}=0

The Attempt at a Solution



We know right from the start that the tension of T3 is going to be 200N.

To begin solving for the tensions of T1 and T2, I started by setting up X and Y component equations:

\SigmaF_{x}= -T1cos(30) + T2cos(50) + 200cos(270) = 0
\SigmaF_{y}= T1sin(150) + T2sin(50) + 200sin(270) = 0

Looking at the X component equation, I figured it would be easiest to solve for T2 in terms of T1, my result being:

T2 = T1cos(30) / cos(50)

I substituted the value of T2 into the component Y equation, and solved for T1:

\SigmaF_{y}= T1sin(150) + [T1cos(30) / cos(50)]*sin(50) + 200sin(270) = 0

I then took my value for T1 and applied it to the original X component equation, and solved for T2.

My problem is the solved values I get for T1 and T2 don't end up adding to equal 0 when in either equation. I realize I must have made an error in my equations, most likely in the trig functions. Any help on identifying where my logic in setting up the equations went wrong would be much appreciated.

Thanks,

Chris
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Draw a vector to define 0deg, and check your angles.

T1, T2, and T3 should be the same sign in both sums.

Regards,

Bill
 
CLeSure said:
My problem is the solved values I get for T1 and T2 don't end up adding to equal 0 when in either equation. I realize I must have made an error in my equations, most likely in the trig functions. Any help on identifying where my logic in setting up the equations went wrong would be much appreciated.

What values did you get?
 
lowlypion said:
what values did you get?

t1 = 130.541
t2 = 175.877
 
CLeSure said:
t1 = 130.541
t2 = 175.877

That's pretty much what I get.

And I'd say that's correct.

All I can think is that you have reversed T1 and T2 in plugging them back into check them. Because if those are the equations that spawned the answers, you should expect that they will calculate back to equal 0, since that's what the components are supposed to add to. If your differences are small then it's likely just rounding errors. If they are large, then it must be putting the wrong values with the wrong angles.
 
LowlyPion said:
That's pretty much what I get.

And I'd say that's correct.

All I can think is that you have reversed T1 and T2 in plugging them back into check them. Because if those are the equations that spawned the answers, you should expect that they will calculate back to equal 0, since that's what the components are supposed to add to. If your differences are small then it's likely just rounding errors. If they are large, then it must be putting the wrong values with the wrong angles.

Thanks for taking the time to help. I rechecked my answers by putting them back into the X-component equation and they equal out to zero. I must have messed up when I was checking my answers before. Thanks!

Chris
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top