Transmission and reflection coefficients for potential barrier

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the smallest non-trivial width of a potential barrier where the transmission probability (T) is 100% and the reflection probability (R) is 0% for an electron with a kinetic energy of 5 eV encountering a 3 eV barrier. Participants analyze the equations for R and T, expressing concerns about the correctness of the formulas provided, particularly regarding their ability to yield real number results. The approach involves setting T equal to 1 and R equal to 0, leading to conditions where the cosine function equals 1 and the sine function equals 0, simplifying the calculations. A proposed solution involves solving for the width using the derived value of 'a' and confirming the results through trigonometric identities. The conversation highlights the importance of verifying mathematical expressions and understanding the implications of complex numbers in quantum mechanics.
mnoir
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An electron with kinetic energy 5 eV (8.01E-19 J) passes through a 3 eV (4.806E-19 J) potential barrier. There are certain widths for this potential barrier in which the transmission probability will equal one hundred percent and the reflection probability will equal zero. Find the smallest non-trivial width in which this occurs.

Homework Equations



R = [i(q2-k2)sin(2qa)exp(-2ika)] / [2kqcos(2qa)-i(k2+q2)sin(2qa)]

T = [2kqexp(-2ika)] / [2kqcos(2qa)-i(k2+q2)sin(2qa)]

k = sqrt(2mE) / hbar

q = sqrt[2m(E-V0)] / hbar

width = 2a
i is imaginary
q = sqrt[2m(E-V0)] / hbar
k = sqrt(2mE) / hbar
m=9.1094E-31 kg
hbar=1.0546E-34 J*s

The Attempt at a Solution



k=1.15E10

q=7.24E9

From here I think you would set T=1 and R=0 and solve for a. I'm not sure if this method is correct, but if so, after plugging in k and q, how do I solve for a if it's in cos, sin, and exp?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure your expressions for R and T are correct? They should be real numbers, but your expressions don't look like they'll yield real number answers.
 
Remember R and T are the reflection and transmission "coefficients" which are between 0 and 1 while r and t are the reflection and transmission "amplitudes" which are (k1-k2)/(k1+k2) and (2k1)/(k1+k2), respectively.
 
As far as I know these are the correct expressions, according to my professor.

For now, assuming these expressions are correct, this is what I have come up with (I could be on the wrong track though):

Set T=1. The numerator and denominator both have 2kq, so find cases in which cos=1 and sin=0 in order to get rid of i(k2+q2)sin(2qa).

T=[2kqexp(-2ika)]/[2kqcos(2qa)] =1
2kq's cancel out
when 2qa=0, 2pi, etc., cos=1
so if you set 2qa=2pi then a=pi/q
solve for q using q=sqrt[2m(E-V0)]/hbar
plug q into solve for a.
Then multiply 2*a in order to find width.
Checking the value I got for a (4.34E-10) by plugging it into cos(2qa) and sin(2qa) I get 1 and zero, respectively.
 
You don't get T=1 under those conditions. You get T=e-2ika. You should understand what dgreenheck is saying, because you're omitting some solutions right now.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...

Similar threads

Back
Top