Transpose of a matrix with mixed indices

[eoghan]

Hi!
Given a matrix A of elements A_i\;^j, which is the right transpose:
A_j\;^i
or
A^j\;_i
?

 

[Fredrik]

Assuming that you mean that $A_i{}^j$ is what's on row i, column j, then the transpose of the matrix has $A_j{}^i$ on row i, column j.

 

[eoghan]

Uhm... I have this equation:
\Lambda^T g \Lambda = g
in index notation:
<br /> \left( \Lambda^T \right)^{\mu}\;_{\rho} g^{\rho}\;_{\alpha}\Lambda^{\alpha}\;_{\nu}=<br /> g^{\mu}\;_{\nu}<br />
now,
<br /> \left( \Lambda^T \right)^{\mu}\;_{\rho}=\Lambda^{\rho}\;_{\mu}<br />
right?
And so I get:
<br /> \Lambda^{\rho}\;_{\mu} g^{\rho}\;_{\alpha}\Lambda^{\alpha}\;_{\nu}=<br /> g^{\mu}\;_{\nu}<br />
Is this equation correct? (I don't think so, because the positions of the indices on the both sides are not correct)

 

[Fredrik]

Actually, in this context (special relativity), it's conventional to write row $\rho$, column $\alpha$ of $g$ as $g_{\rho\alpha}$.

The convention for $g^{-1}$ is that row $\rho$, column $\alpha$ is written as $g^{\rho\alpha}$.

Also note that when you multiply the original equation by $g^{-1}$ from the left, you find that $$\Lambda^{-1}=g^{-1}\Lambda^Tg.$$ Row $\rho$, column $\alpha$ of this matrix is written as
$$(\Lambda^{-1})^\rho{}_\alpha =(g^{-1}\Lambda^Tg)^\rho{}_\alpha =g^{\rho\beta}\Lambda^\mu{}_\beta g_{\mu\alpha}=\Lambda_\alpha{}^\rho.$$

 

[qbert]

here's my 2 cents.

suppose i have two vector spaces (say X and Y) and a linear map f:X->Y
then you automatically get a map f^*:Y^*->X^*
usually called the transpose or pullback. it's defined in the obvious way. let ω in Y^*
then (f^*ω)(x) = ω(fx).

if we have an inner product on X and Y we have an identification of X^*
with X and Y^* with Y. we can use this to define the transpose map
f^T: Y ->X.

Specifically, define θ:X->X^* by (θx)(x') = (x,x') for all x' in X.
similarly let ψ:Y->Y^* {(ψy)(y')=(y,y')}. We put
f^T = θ^-1f^*ψ.

or θf^T = f^*ψ.
then for any y we have
θf^T(y) = f^*ψ(y)
both sides are elements of X^* so that we can compare them
by their action on an arbitrary x in X
θf^T(y)[x] = (f^Ty, x)
f^*ψ(y)[x] = ψ(y)( fx ) = (y, fx)

so we have a coordinate independent definition of transpose for
a map between two inner product spaces.
Take a basis for X and Y.

And find the components of any map f:X->Y by
(fx)ⁱ = fⁱ_j x^j

we have
(y, fx) = g_ijyⁱ(fx)^j = g_ijyⁱf^j_kx^k

and(f^Ty, x) = G_ij(f^Ty)ⁱx^j= G_ij(f^T)ⁱ_ky^kx^j.

Reindex the dummy variables and compare:
g_ijf^j_k = G_jk(f^T)^j_i.

or using the convention that the inverse of G has components G^ij

(f^T)ⁱ_j = g_jkf^k_lG^li.

using the convention that g (or G) raises or lowers indices we have

(f^T)ⁱ_j = f_jⁱ.

-----------------------

This is just a longwinded way to say
g_ijf^j_k = G_jk(f^T)^j_i is the same as f_ik = (f^T)_ki,
then make indices match on both sides of the equation.