Travel time for apollo to the moon with Kepler's thirs law

AI Thread Summary
Using Kepler's third law to calculate the travel time to the Moon yields a period of 9 days and 13 hours, resulting in a travel time of 4 days and 18 hours. This calculation does not account for factors such as the Moon's gravity, the Earth's rotation, and the spacecraft's trajectory, which differ from a simple elliptical orbit. The Apollo missions took about 3 days, suggesting that the actual travel path and gravitational influences significantly affect travel time. The trajectory involves a combination of orbits rather than a single Keplerian orbit, allowing for quicker travel. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurate calculations in space travel.
alex123go
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

For one of my project in school, i need to calculate the travel time to the moon. To do that, I thought to use Kepler's third law which is :
(2(pi) / P )2 * a3 = GM

where :

P : period of travel
a : major semiaxes (not sure in english, but it is the half the longest radius of the ellipse) : in this case half of the earth-moon distance : 380 400km/2= 190 200km
G : gravitational constant : 6.67E-11

M : Earth's mass : 5,972E24 kg

Whit these values, my period is equal to 9 days and 13 hours, so the travel time to the moon is the half of that and is 4 days and 18 hours.

But in the apollo program, it takes about 3 days to go to the moon. Can someone help me to figure out why does I have almost 2 days of difference.

Is it because I didn't took notice of the moon gravity, because the spacecraft wasn't doing an ellipse like this or for another reason?

Thank you for your help
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
a : major semiaxes (not sure in english, but it is the half the longest radius of the ellipse)
In English: "semi major axis" ... the longest axis is the "major axis", and "semi-" means "half of" ... but "major semi-axis" also works.

There are infinite possible ellipses that would take a spacecraft from the Earth to the Moon - do they all have the same travel time?
You neglected the effect the rotation of the Earth would have and the relative initial positions of the craft and the moon ... as well as the Moon's gravity. What happens when the Moon's gravity is stronger than the Earth's? Does the scenario fit the requirements for Kepler's 3rd Law? You can find descriptions of the Apollo mission online to see how they did it.
 
Thank you for ou help. And I will look for the description on internet.
 
Consider that the spacecraft starts out in orbit about the Earth, and ends up in orbit about the Moon - traveling via the crossover point where Earth and Moon gravity cancel. Thus the trajectory is not going to be just one Kepler orbit - but a combination of them. They could get to the crossover point as quickly as they liked, and then burn fuel to sow down so the Moon can capture them.
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...
Back
Top