How Do I Calculate the Velocity and Include the Sling in Trebuchet Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ahmadove
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trebuchet
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the velocity of a projectile in a trebuchet, it's essential to understand that the energy transfer from the counterweight to the projectile involves more than just potential and kinetic energy equations. The dynamics of the trebuchet, including the role of the sling, significantly influence the projectile's velocity and trajectory. The sling acts as a lever, enhancing the acceleration of the projectile, which complicates the calculations beyond basic energy conservation principles. Additionally, factors like air resistance, especially with lightweight projectiles like wiffle balls, can affect the accuracy of your results. For precise calculations, consider using more advanced methods or simulations that account for all variables involved in the trebuchet's mechanics.
ahmadove
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
SORRY if its the wrong place for the topic but I am new >.<
hi umm ... I am grade 11 and i got this trebuchet project for school, i built the thing
and now i got to do the calculations , i KNOW that mgh( for the counter weight) = 1/2 mv^2 ( for the projectile) but i don't know how to explain this, like WHY? is it so.. i know that according to the law of conservation of energy, that energy can neither be created nor destroyed, but i was thinking, as the counter weight drops down, its potential energy is transferred into it moving and as its a see-saw (or however u spell that) shape then the projectile gets the energy transferred too moving up (based on the axle) but if i want to calculate the velocity of the projectile then i have to be exact, like umm...the sling increases the range of the trebuchet, but with that above equation i don't see anything that includes the sling in it, where the sling does really have a big role in increasing the velocity and acceleration so.first how do i include the sling in there, second is how do i know the angle of departure of the projectile..its aprox 45 but idk...anyways here's the data:

projectile = wiffle ball, 47 grams
counter weight = 20 kg
distance traveled by proj. = 14 m
drop of counter weight = 66.5 cm
time...no idea..but after being calculated with an "attempt" i think its 0.74 sec..but i don't think that's right because it took longer than that while i t was airborne
attempted calculation initial velocity of proj = 26.9 m/s
so yah...any help? please
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Unfortunately, I don't think a trebuchet can be effectively modeled using conservation of energy between the ball and the counterweight. It's really a dynamics problem, where the counterweight accelerates the arm, which in turn accelerates the sling, which accelerates the ball.

Did you teacher tell you to make any special assumptions when analyzing the projectile or trebuchet as a whole? The calculations can be done, but it will take more than PE = KE...
 
ahmadove,

Welcome to PF!

If you have access to a DiffE solver, (ie; Mathematica) this is a really good treatment of the principals involved in trebuchet design;

http://www.algobeautytreb.com/trebmath35.pdf

At HS math level, the above may be beyond you... but I recommend you have a look anyway. You will gain an appreciation of all the variables involved and how they relate.
.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If a wiffle ball has holes in it - like the ones I saw a looong time ago - then
you have a HUGE air resistance factor to cope with. Since it is a school project, you probably cannot re-run your test with a small mass solid object that is not like a wiffle ball.

Wiffle balls decelerate very fast, and gollow an very unpredictable path.

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003APS..DFD.MJ005U
 
I helped my son and his buddies build one for senior year competition to shoot a waterballon. the score was 1/3 of the physics grade
school record was 15 meters. we reset it to 56 meters.
according to the rules of contest, they kids should have gotten 375 points
I don't think the school was as impressed as we were
(we shot water ballons all over the neighborhood that summer, and my wife was as impressed as the physics teacher)
why don't they have contests between companies for us grownups like that
good for 1/3 my annual pay raise

dr
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top