Trends in Trainings on Engineering Standards

  • Thread starter Thread starter anoop_gupta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Engineering Trends
AI Thread Summary
Engineers typically receive training on standards set by organizations like ASME, IEEE, and ASTM, but specific frequency and average training numbers per year vary widely. Corporate spending on training for standard-based certifications is often confidential, making it difficult to obtain precise figures, though some industry averages may be available through independent research. There is a concern that this spending may not be uniform across all engineering fields, as not all require adherence to such standards. Challenges in maintaining compliance and understanding standards are common among engineers and corporations, particularly as technology evolves faster than existing standards. Overall, while specific data is hard to come by, industry trends indicate a growing need for training in standards compliance.
anoop_gupta
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
I am trying to understand how the corporates are dealing the problem of skill gap in engineering industry and are they focusing on training of their engineers to speed up their learning curve?
Hi,

Could anybody please help me with the following information:

1) Frequency of engineers receiving trainings on standards/competencies set by organizations such as ASME, IEEE, ASTM, etc.? Average number of trainings per engineer per year?

2) Corporates spend per year per engineer on trainings for standard-based certifications and compliances? Is this spend increasing or decreasing and how much has been the year-on-year growth in spend in the last five years? Also, is this spend expected to grow in future? If yes, then how much growth is expected?

3) Key challenges faced by corporates/engineers in maintaining standards compliance, acquiring or retaining certifications, and understanding and applying appropriate standards to designs?

Any help would be of highly appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I don't think anyone could produce numbers like that for all corporations in all countries. Companies are likely to consider that data confidential.

Not all fields of engineering require use of such standards or certification of engineers. State of the art software in particular is often years ahead of standards.
 
anorlunda said:
I don't think anyone could produce numbers like that for all corporations in all countries. Companies are likely to consider that data confidential.

Not all fields of engineering require use of such standards or certification of engineers. State of the art software in particular is often years ahead of standards.
Thanks for replying. I do understand that company-specific data is confidential but I am looking for industry average spend on engineers' training. Many independent research providers publish average annual training spend across employee class based on their survey with industry. However, they do not talk specifically about engineers. Hence, if someone could share the industry average spend based in their knowledge and experience, I would be really grateful. Thanks
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
12K
Back
Top