Triangular numbers and v-t graph

  • Thread starter Thread starter lwymarie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph Numbers
AI Thread Summary
The displacement of an object can be calculated using the area under a velocity-time (v-t) graph, which in this case totals 150m. The acceleration is given as 0.75 m/s², leading to a displacement calculation based on the sum of displacements over time. A mistake was identified in the calculation of total displacement, specifically in the formula for the sum of consecutive integers. The correct sum should be calculated using n(n+1)/2, resulting in a total displacement of 157.5m, which aligns closely with the v-t graph's indication of 150m. Accurate calculations and understanding of formulas are crucial for determining displacement in uniformly accelerated motion.
lwymarie
Messages
89
Reaction score
1
http://student.shcc.edu.hk/~s021107/phy.GIF

Displacement=area under v-t graph = 150m

using another concept,
the acceleration is 0.75m^s-2, so the displacement at
1s=0.75m
2s=0.75*2m
.
.
.
20s=0.75*20m

total displacement =sum of displacement of every second
=0.75*(1+2+3+...+18+19+20)
=157.5m
Can you tell me wt's wrong here?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your link isn't working, but I assume you are describing uniformly accelerated motion starting from rest.

Since v = at:

At t = 0s, the speed is 0 m/s
At t = 1s, the speed is 1*.75 = 0.75 m/s
At t = 2s, the speed is 2*.75 = 1.5 m/s, ... etc.

To find the displacement during each second, use \Delta d = v_{ave} \Delta t, where the average speed equals v_{ave} = (v_i + v_f)/2. Add these displacements and you'll find that they total to 150m.
 


Thank you for sharing the link to the v-t graph and discussing the concept of triangular numbers. The displacement of an object can indeed be calculated by finding the area under the v-t graph, as you mentioned. However, in your calculation of the total displacement, there seems to be a mistake. The formula for the sum of consecutive integers from 1 to n is n(n+1)/2, not n(n-1)/2 as you used. So the correct calculation would be 0.75*(1+2+3+...+18+19+20) = 0.75*210 = 157.5m. This aligns with the given displacement of 150m, showing that the object has not moved in the opposite direction and the v-t graph is consistent with the given information. It's important to check our calculations and formulas to ensure accuracy in our results.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top