Tricky integral in QM variational method

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding variational parameters \(\beta\) and \(\mu\) for a particle in one dimension, where the group-state wave function is defined as \(\varphi(\beta,\mu)=Asin(βx)exp(-\mux^{2})\) for \(x \geq 0\). The Hamiltonian and potential field are also specified, with particular attention to the normalization of the wave function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the general procedure for minimizing the Hamiltonian and express confusion regarding the evaluation of the normalization coefficient \(A\). There is mention of a specific integral involving \(e^{-x^2}\) and its relation to the normalization process.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on evaluating the integral by suggesting techniques such as transforming the problem into a two-dimensional integral and using polar coordinates. Others have acknowledged the assistance and expressed gratitude.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted concern regarding the form of the integral needed for normalization, as the closest tabulated integral differs from the one presented in the problem. The discussion also highlights the potential complexity introduced by the wave function's form.

akehn
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the variational parameters [itex]\beta[/itex], [itex]\mu[/itex] for a particle in one in one dimension whose group-state wave function is given as:

[itex]\varphi[/itex]([itex]\beta[/itex],[itex]\mu[/itex])=Asin(βx)exp(-[itex]\mu[/itex][itex]x^{2}[/itex]) for x≥0.

The wavefunction is zero for x<0.

Homework Equations


The Hamiltonian is given as:

H=-[itex]\frac{\\hbar^{2}}{2m}[/itex][itex]\frac{d^{2}}{dx^{2}}[/itex]+V(x)

Where the potential field is defined as follows: V(x)=+∞ for x<0
and V(x)=[itex]\frac{-f}{(x+a)^{2}}[/itex] for x≥0

The terms f, a are positive constants.

3. The Attempt at a Solution
I am familiar with the general procedure. I know that

E(β,μ)=<T> + <V>

Where E are the eigen energies and T, V are the kinetic and potential energies, respectively.

To minimize the Hamiltonian one takes partial derivatives of E with respect to β and μ, setting each term equal to zero to determine the variational parameters. This is all straightfoward.

My confusion lies in the evaluation of the normalization coefficient A from <[itex]\varphi[/itex]|[itex]\varphi[/itex]>=1

The closest tabulated integral has "x" in the exponential term, not "x[itex]^{2}[/itex]"

Any help on solving this integral would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
akehn said:

Homework Statement


Find the variational parameters [itex]\beta[/itex], [itex]\mu[/itex] for a particle in one in one dimension whose group-state wave function is given as:

[itex]\varphi[/itex]([itex]\beta[/itex],[itex]\mu[/itex])=Asin(βx)exp(-[itex]\mu[/itex][itex]x^{2}[/itex]) for x≥0.

The wavefunction is zero for x<0.

Homework Equations


The Hamiltonian is given as:

H=-[itex]\frac{\\hbar^{2}}{2m}[/itex][itex]\frac{d^{2}}{dx^{2}}[/itex]+V(x)

Where the potential field is defined as follows: V(x)=+∞ for x<0
and V(x)=[itex]\frac{-f}{(x+a)^{2}}[/itex] for x≥0

The terms f, a are positive constants.

3. The Attempt at a Solution
I am familiar with the general procedure. I know that

E(β,μ)=<T> + <V>

Where E are the eigen energies and T, V are the kinetic and potential energies, respectively.

To minimize the Hamiltonian one takes partial derivatives of E with respect to β and μ, setting each term equal to zero to determine the variational parameters. This is all straightfoward.

My confusion lies in the evaluation of the normalization coefficient A from <[itex]\varphi[/itex]|[itex]\varphi[/itex]>=1

The closest tabulated integral has "x" in the exponential term, not "x[itex]^{2}[/itex]"

Any help on solving this integral would be greatly appreciated.

Hi akehn, welcome to PF! :smile:

Integrals of the form [itex]\int_0^\infty e^{-x^2}dx[/itex] can be easily computed by first calculating the square of the integral, transforming the problem from one of calculating a one-dimensional integral to one of calculating a two-dimensional integral over a region, since the 2D integral can be done easily by switching to polar coordinates

[tex]\begin{align} \left( \int_0^{\infty} e^{-x^2}dx \right)^2 &= \left( \int_0^{\infty} e^{-x^2}dx \right) \left( \int_0^\infty e^{-x^2}dx \right) \\ &= \left( \int_0^{\infty} e^{-x^2}dx \right)\left( \int_0^\infty e^{-y^2}dy \right) \\ &= \int_0^{\infty} \int_0^{\infty} e^{-(x^2 + y^2)}dxdy \\ &= \int_0^{\infty} \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} e^{-r^2}r dr d\theta \end{align}[/tex]

You can utilize this technique for your integral, by using Euler's formula to write [itex]\sin^2 (\beta x)[/itex] in terms of complex exponentials, then "completing the square on the exponent" and making a substitution to get your integrand in the correct form.
 
Last edited:
Ah ha! Thank you very much.
 
akehn said:
Ah ha! Thank you very much.

You're welcome! Note that I made a small edit to my post to correct typos, the only one of significance being that the upper limit on the polar angle in the last integral should be [itex]\frac{\pi}{2}[/itex] (90°), not [itex]\frac{\pi}{4}[/itex] (45°).
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K