XtremePhysX said:
I tried to find the acceleration by doing ma=mg-mkv^2.
That's the right Newton's 2
nd law for the ascension (who knew how to spell this word?..) From that you can parts (ii) and (iii) (hint for part (ii): What happens at the terminal velocity that would allow you to solve for it from that equation?)
For part (iv) you are going to need to do something to the left-hand side of the equation:\frac{dv}{dt} = -\frac{g}{{V_t}^{2}} ({V_t}^2 + v^2) Note: For the love of god change upper-case 'V' to 'V_t' to avoid confusion with lower-case 'v'...
What are you going to have to do to the left-hand side? Well you want just v's and x's, t's are bad because you want some final form x(v). A rule from standard calculus will allow you to write this side in terms of just 'v' and 'x'. Hint: It's a rule so divisive that Joe Biden was in the news for even mentioning it recently.
Edit #1: I notice your mentioning of terminal velocity and perhaps some misunderstanding regarding it. Terminal velocity is the velocity at which a particle is going so fast (due to a velocity independent accelerating force) that some resistive force (that's a function of 'v') will get so large as to perfectly oppose it. In other words,
it's a velocity at which there is zero acceleration on the particle. Notice that they make you calculate it on the descent first in part (ii) before part (iii). You need to use the same value you get in part (ii) for part (iii), it's not physically going to change during ascent/descent, but it makes more sense to calculate it for the descent equation because in that equation it's actually something reachable...
Edit #2: Further hint for the left-hand side stuff I was mentioning. You are going to want some form on the left-hand side that contains \frac{dx}{dt} which you are simply going to call 'v'. That's how you get rid of the 't' after you apply the infamous rule I hinted at.
Edit #3: Woops, I put that the left-hand side stuff was for part (iii), I meant to say that it's for part (iv)..