Trig Integration Discrepancy in Fourier Series Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter NewtonianAlch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Trig
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around discrepancies in integral calculations related to Fourier Series in Circuit Analysis. The user confirmed their calculations using MAPLE but found different results in the textbook, raising concerns about the accuracy of the solutions manual. Key integrals were evaluated, particularly focusing on the behavior of cosine functions at specific values. The user noted that the term cos(nPi/2) does not align with the book's representation, leading to variations in subsequent calculations and plots. This inconsistency emphasizes the importance of verifying integral results in Fourier analysis.
NewtonianAlch
Messages
453
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This question is part of Fourier Series in Circuit Analysis. There were fairly straightforward integrals which I calculated and confirmed using MAPLE to be correct, however the book gives somewhat different answers. I would presume that what I did was correct and the solutions manual made an error, however since it's a fairly large question with answers being carried forward I want to make doubly sure. Sorry about the size of the images, I will remove them after the problem

This is the integral essentially, the definite integral from 2 to 4 is left out because it's zero,

f(t) = 5 for 0 < t < 1
f(t) = 10 for 1 < t < 2

http://img189.imageshack.us/img189/1379/dsc0007ob.jpg

Homework Equations



cos (Pi/2) = (-1)^{\frac{n-1}{2}}

cos (Pi) = (-1)^{n}

The Attempt at a Solution



My answer came to this:

http://img542.imageshack.us/img542/7613/dsc0008ryz.jpg

EDIT: cos(nPi/2) goes to (-1)^n/2 - still doesn't reconcile my answers with the book though.

The MAPLE output was:

5\,{\frac {1+\cos \left( 1/2\,n\pi \right) -2\,\cos \left( n\pi <br /> \right) }{n\pi }}

The answer in the book was (last line before the table):

http://img600.imageshack.us/img600/9624/dsc0009cm.jpg

As you can imagine, because the answers are different, the values in the table are going to be different and hence whatever I have to plot afterwards will be different.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
##(-1)^{integer}## cannot produce any zeros, it can only produce +1 or -1. So it doesn't replace ##cos(n \pi / 2)##.
 
I should have been clearer, cos (n*Pi/2) is replaced by (-1)^n/2

So if n = 3, I'm guessing that term is ignored because you can't compute that. At least that's the identity they gave in the book.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top