Trigonometric Form and the Surprising Result: 1=-1?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the equality 1 = -1 in the context of complex numbers. It highlights that while 1 can be expressed as e^(i2π) and e^(iπ), the interpretation of roots in complex numbers differs from real numbers. In the real number system, the square root function is single-valued, leading to the definition of the positive root, while in the complex system, multiple values can arise. The mistake lies in assuming that 1^(1/2) must equal 1, ignoring the multi-valued nature of complex roots. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the complexities of defining functions in the realm of complex numbers.
springo
Messages
125
Reaction score
0
Hi,
as I was studying complex numbers today I came across this, and I couldn't explain it:
1=e^{i0}
1=e^{i2\Pi}
1^{1/2}=e^{i2\Pi/2}
1=e^{i\Pi}
1=-1
Where is the mistake?
Thank you very much for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
springo said:
1=e^{i2\pi}
1^{1/2}=e^{i2\pi/2}
Why would you think that the latter equation follows from the former?
 
1^{1/2}=(e^{i2\pi})^{1/2}
Is that wrong?
 
The question really was, "why do you think that 11/2= 1?". In the real number system we take functions to be "single valued". In the complex number system that is no longer possible.

In particular, in the real number system, we define x1/2 to be "the positive number, a, such that a2= x". Since the complex numbers are not an ordered field that definition cannot be used.
 
OK, so basically I would have to take -1, but why not take 1 too?
And if I take 1, I still get 1=-1, right?
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top