Trigonometry Substitution (Integral)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an integral involving trigonometric substitution, specifically focusing on the antiderivative of a function related to the expression 1/sqrt(16+4x^2). Participants are exploring the appropriate methods and substitutions to solve the integral.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the necessity of trigonometric substitution and suggesting alternative approaches, including hyperbolic functions. There are discussions about the correctness of specific algebraic manipulations and the implications of different substitutions.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of various substitution methods, with some participants expressing confidence in their approaches while others suggest reconsidering certain steps. Guidance has been offered regarding the need to verify derivatives and the importance of correctly applying trigonometric identities.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention that the original poster's professor has emphasized the use of trigonometric substitutions, which may influence the direction of the discussion. There is also a note about the potential unfamiliarity with hyperbolic functions among some participants.

KDeep
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Making sure I got the right answer.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • IMG_0375.jpg
    IMG_0375.jpg
    45 KB · Views: 396
Physics news on Phys.org
Um, sec(theta)^2/sqrt(sec(theta)^2) isn't equal to 1.
 
Hmm... I don't think so.

This doesn't need a trig sub at all. Remember your basic algebra too!

Hint: Look at the integral of the hyperbolic sine function, and see if there is something you can do to your function to make it a simple integral of that form.
 
Dick said:
Um, sec(theta)^2/sqrt(sec(theta)^2) isn't equal to 1.

Correct, so its 1/4∫ secθ dθ

which is ln | secθ + tanθ | + C

1/4ln | (x+2/2) + (x/2) | is the answer right?
 
1MileCrash said:
Hmm... I don't think so.

This doesn't need a trig sub at all. Remember your basic algebra too!

Hint: Look at the integral of the hyperbolic sine function, and see if there is something you can do to your function to make it a simple integral of that form.

I think it's pretty likely that KDeep hasn't done hyperbolic trig functions yet, though that does make it easier. You need some kind of substitution. Ordinary trig will work fine. You just have to do it right.
 
I have never heard about hyperbolic sine function at all, I will definitely look into that. My Professor wants us to do trig substitutions since it is in the section.
 
KDeep said:
Correct, so its 1/4∫ secθ dθ

which is ln | secθ + tanθ | + C

1/4ln | (x+2/2) + (x/2) | is the answer right?

When you take the derivative of your solution, do you get the function you wished to integrate?
 
KDeep said:
Correct, so its 1/4∫ secθ dθ

which is ln | secθ + tanθ | + C

1/4ln | (x+2/2) + (x/2) | is the answer right?

Getting close. Try the sec(arctan(x/2)) part again.
 
1MileCrash said:
When you take the derivative of your solution, do you get the function you wished to integrate?

I am confident that the derivative of ln| secθ + tanθ | is secθ.
 
  • #10
KDeep said:
I am confident that the derivative of ln| secθ + tanθ | is secθ.

You are finding the antiderivative of 1/sqrt(16+4x^2), so your solution must yield 1/sqrt(16+4x^2) (or equivalent) when it is differentiated.

I think it's pretty likely that KDeep hasn't done hyperbolic trig functions yet, though that does make it easier. You need some kind of substitution. Ordinary trig will work fine. You just have to do it right.

I misspoke anyway - I meant inverse hyperbolic sine, but yes, you're right.
 
  • #11
1MileCrash said:
You are finding the antiderivative of 1/sqrt(16+4x^2), so your solution must yield 1/sqrt(16+4x^2) (or equivalent) when it is differentiated.

I am using trigonometry substitutions though. I replaced x with 2tanθ, and dx with 2sec^2θdθ
 
  • #12
KDeep said:
I am using trigonometry substitutions though. I replaced x with 2tanθ, and dx with 2sec^2θdθ

It doesn't matter. Given those replacements, replace them back when you have your solution.
 
  • #13
You are almost there. You got the sec(arctan(x/2)) part wrong and you need to correct a simple numerical mistake. That's all.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K