Trip to Saturn: Constant Acceleration of 9.81 m/s^2 - Is It Possible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mootlime
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Saturn
AI Thread Summary
A spaceship accelerating at 9.81 m/s^2 would create a sensation similar to gravity, allowing occupants to stand comfortably if positioned correctly. Calculations suggest that with this constant acceleration, reaching Saturn could theoretically take around 225 days, with significant velocity increases over time. However, correcting initial errors in calculations reveals that a more realistic scenario for "free fall" to Saturn would take approximately 6 days, achieving only 1.70% of light speed. The discussion highlights the complexities of acceleration and relativistic mass, emphasizing that while constant acceleration is theoretically intriguing, practical limitations exist. Ultimately, the feasibility of such travel remains speculative and dependent on overcoming significant technological challenges.
Mootlime
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
If I am in a spaceship and it begins a constant acceleration of 9.81 m/s^2, would I be able to stand up in the spaceship and it would feel the same as gravity? (This is assuming the fact that my feet were placed in the direction of the thrust source.)

I've done some equations, and a ship with this hypothetical acceleration capacity (regardless of fuel source, and assuming it could compensate for its mass increase due to relativity)...

My calculations put it at reaching Saturn in 225 days...

Here is the data I am using:

Distance to Saturn = 1,321,416,800 km

After 24 hours of continued acceleration (+9.81 m/s every second) the velocity would be roughly 848,000 m/s

By day 100 it would be 84,800,000 m/s

And by the day you reached Saturn (day 225) it would be 190,800,000 m/s or roughly 426 million miles per hour -- and 63.64% of the speed of light.

Are these numbers totally wrong? Someone smarter please help me. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The velocity after time t, is gt, but the distance you've reached after a time t = (1/2)gt^2 and this should be equal to the distance to saturn.

this gets you t ^2 = 2(1.321 * 10^12)/9.81, so t = 5.19 * 10^5 s = 144 hours = 6.01 days.
If you want to decelerate as well, you'd accelerate for half the distance, which you reach in 4.25 days, and then decelerate for the same time, reaching saturn after 8.5 days.
 
I adjusted my equations and found the error (was multiplying by 60 instead of 86,400 -- that certainly does change the results.) To "free fall" to Saturn with the assumption of Earth's gravity (and no friction) would take 6 days :) I find that kind of interesting. So at the end of the "fall" you'd only be going 1.70% light speed. That makes a ton more sense than what crazy results I had. Thank you.
 
IF you could accelerate at 9.81m/s2, you could cross the width of the universe well within your lifetime. It's interesting, but it's a BIG "if".
 
Mootlime said:
If I am in a spaceship and it begins a constant acceleration of 9.81 m/s^2, would I be able to stand up in the spaceship and it would feel the same as gravity? (This is assuming the fact that my feet were placed in the direction of the thrust source.)

I've done some equations, and a ship with this hypothetical acceleration capacity (regardless of fuel source, and assuming it could compensate for its mass increase due to relativity)...
Since the person standing in the spaceship is motionless with respect to the spaceship, there would be no "mass increased due to relativity".
 
I was speaking of the fuel source/acceleration problem, that as the ship increased in velocity it would also increase in mass because of relativity, meaning it would need more energy to sustain its acceleration. I was told that this is one of the main problems with accelerating up to 99% of the speed of light.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top