What exactly is a set with no elements? What does it mean? Aren't sets entirely defined by their contents? In what manner is a set with no contents defined?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I'm not arguing for or against such an axiom... I simply want to know what the axiom actually is saying. If an empty set is not well-defined, what is it actually asserting?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Trouble comprehending the empty set

Loading...

Similar Threads for Trouble comprehending empty |
---|

B Empty domains and the vacuous truth |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**