Trouble understanding dual tensors

  • Thread starter Thread starter cwbullivant
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dual Tensors
cwbullivant
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Using 26.40, show that a pseudovector p and antisymmetric second rank tensor (in three dimensions) A are related by: $$ {A}_{ij} = {\epsilon}_{ijk}{p}_{k} $$

Homework Equations



26.40: $$ {p}_{i} = \frac{1}{2}{\epsilon}_{ijk}{A}_{jk} $$

The Attempt at a Solution



This isn't a homework question (though it may tread rather close to one). The book I'm working out of is Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering by Riley, Hobson, and Bence. I'm having trouble understanding their demonstration of the association of any arbitrary three dimensional second rank antisymmetric tensor with a pseudovector.

The step they use that I'm having trouble with is (the initial contraction and substitution of the kronecker delta identity wasn't a problem):

$$ {\epsilon}_{ijk}{p}_{k} = \frac{1}{2}({\delta}_{il}{\delta}_{jm} - {\delta}_{im}{\delta}_{jl}){A}_{lm} $$

And then:

$$ {\epsilon}_{ijk}{p}_{k} = \frac{1}{2}({A}_{ij}-{A}_{ji}) = {A}_{ij} $$

The very last equality I understand, since Aij are the components of an antisymmetric tensor. I don't get exactly what they did with the delta functions though. In attempting to recreate their work, I get to:

$$ {\epsilon}_{ijk}{p}_{k} = \frac{1}{2}(1-{\delta}_{ij}{\delta}_{ji}){A}_{ij} $$

Which reduces to zero on both sides if i = j, and if i != j:

$$ {\epsilon}_{ijk}{p}_{k} = \frac{1}{2}{A}_{ij} $$

The step they appear to be taking is:

$$ {\delta}_{ij}{\delta}_{ji}{A}_{ij} = {A}_{ji} $$

And I can't seem to work out that equality.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cwbullivant said:
The step they use that I'm having trouble with is (the initial contraction and substitution of the kronecker delta identity wasn't a problem):

$$ {\epsilon}_{ijk}{p}_{k} = \frac{1}{2}({\delta}_{il}{\delta}_{jm} - {\delta}_{im}{\delta}_{jl}){A}_{lm} $$
Assuming that the right-hand side expression is summed over l and m, the only ##\delta## terms that survive are those where ##i=l, j=m## (first product of ##\delta##'s) and ##i=m, j=l## (second product of ##\delta##'s).
So you get: $$ {\epsilon}_{ijk}{p}_{k} = \frac{1}{2}({\delta}_{ii}{\delta}_{jj}{A}_{ij} - {\delta}_{ii}{\delta}_{jj}{A}_{ji})= \frac{1}{2}({A}_{ij}-{A}_{ji})$$
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top