Trouble using the Bethe Formula

septemberskies
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
So I'm doing research with a professor and he wants me to use the Bethe formula to calculate stopping power for alpha particles of various energies, but I'm having a lot of trouble using it, and I figured I'd ask here before I bothered him.
He wanted me to use the non-relativistic version listed on Wikipedia (from Sigmund 2006, and I've seen it other places in the same form, so I don't think it's a problem with the formula). Here it is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bethe_formula
I was getting very confusing answers, so I tried just going through the formula with nothing but the units and seeing if they worked out. The units we want for dE/dx are eV/m or eV/cm (or Joules/distance, I guess), correct? The main issue I'm having is that, with the units, I keep getting an answer per seconds to the TENTH, when it's only supposed to be seconds squared, and I cannot for the life of me figure out where the extra s^-8 is coming from. My first instinct is that it's from the units of the permittivity squared, but the rest of the units of the permittivity seem to work out fine.
Any idea where I'm going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to show us how you get the dimensions you see. One wild guess \beta is non-dimensional.
 
isn't mc^2 energy? So [energy]-1
then \Big( \frac{z^2 e^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \Big)^2 has [force]2* [lenght]4 = [energy]2 * [length] 2 (distance times force = work = energy)
and finally n has # / [length]3

The result is:
[energy]-1 [energy]2 [length]2 [length]-3 = [energy]/[length] for what I see...
 
It turned out that I made a really stupid mistake. When I was looking up Coulomb in base units since I don't know it offhand, I apparently misread it as A/s instead of A*s. Everything works out now. Thanks for replying, everyone. It helped me narrow down to the part of the equation I was messing up on.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top