Trouble with Peskin QFT textbook

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a scattering calculation from Peskin's QFT textbook, specifically in chapter 5, focusing on equation 5.10. The user is trying to compute the dot product of two bracketed terms related to momentum and mass, setting the electron mass to zero. They initially arrive at an incorrect expression due to a mistake in applying the Minkowski metric. After realizing the error, they indicate that they have resolved the issue. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly using the Minkowski metric in quantum field theory calculations, particularly in scattering problems involving momentum vectors in the center of mass frame.
DeathbyGreen
Messages
83
Reaction score
15
I'm trying to work through a scattering calculation in the Peskin QFT textbook in chapter 5, specifically getting equation 5.10. They take two bracketed terms

<br /> 4[p&#039;^{\mu}p^{\nu}+p&#039;^{\nu}p^{\mu}-g^{\mu\nu}(p \cdot p&#039;+m_e^2)]<br />

and

<br /> 4[k_{\mu}k&#039;_{\nu}+k_{\nu}k&#039;_{\mu}-g_{\mu\nu}(k \cdot k&#039;+m_{\mu}^2)]<br />

they set m_e=0 and take the dot product of these two to get

<br /> {32e^4}[(p \cdot k)(p&#039; \cdot k&#039;)+(p \cdot k&#039;)(p&#039; \cdot k)+m^2_{\mu}(p \cdot p&#039;)]<br />

When I do this I get
<br /> 16[2(p&#039; \cdot k)(p \cdot k&#039;)+2(k \cdot p)(p&#039; \cdot k&#039;)-3(p&#039; \cdot p)(k&#039; \cdot k)-(p&#039; \cdot p)m^2_{\mu}]<br />
In this scattering problem the two incoming momenta are p and p&#039; and outgoing k and k&#039;, so working in the COM frame I suspect there is a reduction you can make but I can't figure out what it is. Any help is appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Disregard I got it; I was using a wrong Minkowski metric relation
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...
Back
Top