Trouble with Peskin QFT textbook

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on a scattering calculation from chapter 5 of the Peskin QFT textbook, specifically regarding equation 5.10. The user initially struggles with the dot product of two bracketed terms involving momenta p, p', k, and k', and their respective masses m_e and m_{\mu}. After deriving an incorrect expression, the user realizes the error stemmed from using an incorrect Minkowski metric relation. This highlights the importance of accurately applying metric conventions in quantum field theory calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory (QFT) principles
  • Familiarity with the Peskin QFT textbook, particularly chapter 5
  • Knowledge of Minkowski spacetime and metric relations
  • Experience with scattering calculations and momentum conservation
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the Minkowski metric and its applications in QFT
  • Study scattering theory as presented in Peskin and Schroeder's QFT textbook
  • Practice deriving dot products of four-momenta in different frames
  • Explore common pitfalls in QFT calculations and how to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum field theory, particularly those working through Peskin and Schroeder's textbook, as well as anyone involved in scattering calculations and theoretical physics.

DeathbyGreen
Messages
83
Reaction score
15
I'm trying to work through a scattering calculation in the Peskin QFT textbook in chapter 5, specifically getting equation 5.10. They take two bracketed terms

<br /> 4[p&#039;^{\mu}p^{\nu}+p&#039;^{\nu}p^{\mu}-g^{\mu\nu}(p \cdot p&#039;+m_e^2)]<br />

and

<br /> 4[k_{\mu}k&#039;_{\nu}+k_{\nu}k&#039;_{\mu}-g_{\mu\nu}(k \cdot k&#039;+m_{\mu}^2)]<br />

they set m_e=0 and take the dot product of these two to get

<br /> {32e^4}[(p \cdot k)(p&#039; \cdot k&#039;)+(p \cdot k&#039;)(p&#039; \cdot k)+m^2_{\mu}(p \cdot p&#039;)]<br />

When I do this I get
<br /> 16[2(p&#039; \cdot k)(p \cdot k&#039;)+2(k \cdot p)(p&#039; \cdot k&#039;)-3(p&#039; \cdot p)(k&#039; \cdot k)-(p&#039; \cdot p)m^2_{\mu}]<br />
In this scattering problem the two incoming momenta are p and p&#039; and outgoing k and k&#039;, so working in the COM frame I suspect there is a reduction you can make but I can't figure out what it is. Any help is appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Disregard I got it; I was using a wrong Minkowski metric relation
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K