Troubleshooting Vector Angles in Three Dimensions

  • Thread starter Thread starter whynot314
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimensions Vectors
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around troubleshooting vector angles in three dimensions, specifically questioning the accuracy of provided answers in a textbook. The user believes their calculated angles, β=52.5, α=121, and γ=53.1, are correct but suspects the textbook may be wrong. They express confusion over the similarity of their results to the book's answers while noting that the gamma angles match. The user seeks clarity on potential errors in their approach to solving the problem. Overall, the thread highlights a common challenge in verifying solutions to complex vector angle problems.
whynot314
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
ok so I am not sure how else to do this problem, my answers look similar to those in the book. where they have β=52.5 \alpha=121 \gamma=53.1, I feel like the book is wrong because i don't see any other way to solve this problem.

[URL=http://s1341.photobucket.com/user/nebula-314/media/20130523_174427_zpsda388c38.jpg.html][PLAIN]http://i1341.photobucket.com/albums/o745/nebula-314/20130523_174427_zpsda388c38.jpg[/URL][/PLAIN]

Heres how I solved for the angles
[URL=http://s1341.photobucket.com/user/nebula-314/media/20130523_174442_zps9be6b8d1.jpg.html][PLAIN]http://i1341.photobucket.com/albums/o745/nebula-314/20130523_174442_zps9be6b8d1.jpg[/URL][/PLAIN]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The gammas are the same so I am unsure where I went wrong.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top