Truss Method of Joints: Solving Unequal Member Forces

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of analyzing a truss structure using the method of joints due to the absence of diagonal bracing. Without diagonals, the structure experiences bending and shear stresses, making the method of joints inappropriate for determining member forces. The asymmetry of the truss further complicates the expectation of equivalent forces on either side. Frame analysis is suggested as a more suitable approach, given the presence of both pin and moment-carrying joints. Proper bracing and a symmetrical design are essential for accurate force calculations in truss analysis.
gmreit
Messages
25
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


The load is known. Just 2 reactions needed to describe all external forces.

Homework Equations


method of joings

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm working on a pretty simple truss for work and want to check some of the elements for buckling. The strange thing is I am not getting equivalent member forces for each side of the truss. Without any additional diagonal bracing in the middle I thought it will be a pretty straight forward case. Not sure what I am missing because I figured Fmn = Fah and Fbc = Ff but I am not getting that.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1865.jpg
    IMG_1865.jpg
    37.1 KB · Views: 500
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Physics news on Phys.org
Firstly, you don't have a truss, because you are missing the diagonals. As a result, you will have bending and shear stresses in the top and bottom chords, so you cannot use the method of joints which pertains to truss members with axial loads only.
Secondly, if you added those diagonals, you could solve for the member forces, but the truss is not symmetrical the way you have drawn it, so you shouldn't expect mirror image forces.
 
I do see what you are saying. Frame analysis would probably be a better fit I believe since joint A, B,C, D, E, F, G, AND N are pin joints but H thru M are moment carrying joints.
 
Back
Top