Trying to calculate the radius of a bubble as it rises....

  • Thread starter Thread starter lucas jonasch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bubble Radius
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the radius of a bubble at a depth of 0.4 meters in a liquid, using known variables such as surface tension and pressures inside and outside the bubble. The user initially attempted to solve the problem using two-variable equations but encountered a negative result, which was unexpected. Upon revisiting the calculations, the user discovered that entering values in scientific notation led to incorrect outputs from the cubic equation calculator. After correcting the input format, the user obtained the expected positive radius value. The discussion highlights the importance of accurate data entry in mathematical computations.
lucas jonasch
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am trying to predict the radius of a bubble at 0.4 m deep in a liquid.
I know:
the surface tension of the liquid (T) .002239 kg*m
the pressure outside the bubble at .5 meters depth (Po1) 394.5 kg/m^2
the pressure inside the bubble at .5 meters depth (PI1) 394.723314 kg/m^2
the radius of the bubble at .5 meters depth (R1) .001 m
the pressure outside the bubble at .4 meters depth (Po2) 315.6 kg/m^2
I do not know:
the pressure inside the bubble at .4 meters depth (PI2)
the radius of the bubble at .4 meters depth (R2)

What I tried to do was: a two-variable equation, using
PI1*(R1^3)=PI2*(R2^3) (p1v1=p2v2)
and
R2=2T/(PI2-Po2) (http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/surten2.html)

I solved it and eventually got:
-Po2(R2^3)-2T(R2^2)+(PI1*(R1^3)=0

However, when I solved the equation I got a negative number, while I'd expect it to be a little bit bigger than a millimeter... I checked my math a few times and I'm pretty sure the equations I'm using make sense?? Does anyone know what's wrong??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aibI4A1Qto-jyQgmZzziKC2Dqr741WAIBAkw8Uw_rto=w501-h889-no.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 20150810_225628.jpg
    20150810_225628.jpg
    21.7 KB · Views: 441
btw, this isn't homework but I assumed this was still a good place to put it
 
LOL! I just realized my mistake (and it was a really DUMB one.) I entered in the data into the online cubic equation calculator keeping scientific notation for 3.94*10^-7. The three values it gave me were: -0.4294762187154887, 0.2147310149344237 + i* 0.37193321976168103, and 0.2147310149344237 - i* 0.37193321976168103.

I then tried to enter it in without scientific notation ( 0.000000394) and it gave me the right values: 0.0010720530955198526, -0.0005431209710805853 + i* 0.0009324852984662585, and -0.0005431209710805853 - i* 0.0009324852984662585.

Thank you for your help and sorry for wasting your time!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top