Trying to generate a bivariate distribution from a univariate distribution

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter csprh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Distribution
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on generating a bivariate distribution from a specified univariate distribution defined as \(\frac{xγ}{((x^2+γ^2)^{1.5})}\). The participants highlight that transforming the univariate distribution into the Fourier domain to obtain its characteristic function is a potential approach. However, they clarify that the original distribution's asymmetry prevents it from being represented as a linear combination of independent components. Instead, they suggest using the product of the probability density functions (PDFs) if the variables are independent and normalizing the PDF through double integration to ensure it meets the criteria of a valid distribution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of probability density functions (PDFs)
  • Familiarity with the Cauchy distribution and its properties
  • Knowledge of Fourier transforms and characteristic functions
  • Experience with double integrals for normalization of distributions
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about the properties of the Cauchy distribution and its applications
  • Study the process of transforming distributions using Fourier transforms
  • Research normalization techniques for probability density functions
  • Explore the transformation theorem for deriving new distributions from existing ones
USEFUL FOR

Statisticians, data scientists, and mathematicians interested in advanced probability theory and distribution transformations will benefit from this discussion.

csprh
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
Hi all

I have a univariate distribution of the form

\frac{xγ}{((x^2+γ^2)^{1.5})}

where both parameters are real and non-negative.

How do I go about finding the bivariate form, where x and y (the new bivariate variables) are still both real and positive?

To explain further what I mean, the univariate cauchy distribution can be similarily is defined as

\frac{(γ/∏)}{(x^2+γ^2)}

where x and y (in this case) are real numbers which can be positive and negative.

it's bivariate distribution can be defined as

\frac{(γ/(2∏))}{(x^2+y^2+γ^2)^{1.5}}

How was this calculation done? One guess I had was to transform the first equation above into the Fourier domain and therefore obtain it's characteristic function. Transform this somehow in the CF domain and invert. Hmmmm. I seem to be a long way off this at the moment.

Any help would be gratefully received. I have spent at least three weeks mucking around with Matlab, Maple and Mathematica, but not to too much avail.

Thanks in advance

Paul
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OK, there goes my 2 cents on this... as far as I remember that's up on how you define your multivariate distribution, let's imaging (X_1...X_n) follows a multivariate Normal distribution or the Cauchy distribution, then every linear combination of its components is also a Normal or a Cauchy distribution.

But the Normal and the Cauchy are both symmetric distributions and yours is not, so there's no way you can get a bivariate distribution where the linear combination of its components will behave as your distribution.

Now, if you forget about that condition and X,Y are independent you only need to multiply their PDF. f(x,y)=f(x) f(y) and if they are not then f(x,y)=f(x|y) f(y|x)

I hope this helps.
 
Hey csprh and welcome to the forums.

If you have a form of a PDF which needs to be normalized to make it a 'true' PDF, then the best way to handle this is to first decide a domain for your PDF (i.e. x is between blah and blah and y is between blah and blah) and then calculate the volume under this function using a double integral, which will give you a number. Also before you do this, make sure your PDF is > 0 at all points in your domain.

When you have done this you will get integral = V which is the volume under the surface. To make this a PDF simply multiply your PDF by 1/V and this will create a proper PDF that you can use for doing distribution calculations.

If you are trying however to treat your random variables as 'particular' distributions and want to find the corresponding distribution of something in relation to this, then you will need to use a transformation theorem to find your PDF in terms of these other variables. So for example let's say you have X and Y which are distributions and want to find the distribution of f(X,Y): you need to use the properties of these (as well as independence properties and conditional properties if they exist) to get your final PDF.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K