Tsunami word problem (waves practice)

  • Thread starter Thread starter cmorissette
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Word problem
AI Thread Summary
A tsunami generated 4000 km off California has a sea surface displacement of 3 meters and a wavelength of 100 km, indicating it is a shallow water wave. The wave speed is calculated to be approximately 198 m/s, taking about 20203 seconds to reach the shore. The frequency is determined to be 505.1 Hz, with a period of about 1.97 milliseconds. As the wave approaches shallower depths, the new wavelength must be recalculated using the new wave speed of approximately 10 m/s, resulting in a wavelength of 5051 m. The amplitude will change as energy is conserved, requiring adjustments based on the power of the wave.
cmorissette
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A Tsunami has been generated as a plane wave 4000km off the shore of California. The sea surface displacement is found to be 3 meters and the wavelength of the tsunami is 100km. You can assume a depth of 4000m from the location of wave generation to shore.

a.) Calculate the speed of the wave (assume it is a deep water wave if h/lambda > 1/4 and it is a shallow wave if h/lambda < 1/20) Estimate the time it will take this wave to reach the shore.

b.) calculate the frequency and period of the tsunami

c.) As the wave approcahes the shore its depth decreases from 4000m to 10m. What is it's new wavelength? (the wave period is conserved as the depth changes)

d.) What is the new amplitude of the wave? (you must conserve energy flux)


Homework Equations


shallow water wave velocity Cp = √gh
frequency = Cp/λ
Period = 1/F


The Attempt at a Solution



Part a is pretty easy. IT is a shallow water wave because h/λ < 1/20. The wave velocity is [(g)(h)]^1/2 which equals ~198m/s. Given the offshore distance of 4000000m, it would take a time of (4E6m/197.99m/s)= 20203 s.

PArt b is also straight forward: The frequency is F= Cp/λ which equals (198m/s)/(100000m) = 505.1 Hz. The period T = 1/F or 1.97E-3 s

Part c is what I'm having trouble on. if the wavelength λ=Cp/F and the period is conserved, does that mean the frequency is also conserved? So does this simply become (198m/s)/505.1s = 0.39m? Or do I need to recalculate Cp with a depth of 10m?

Cp= [(g)(10m)]^1/2 = ~10m/s so then wavelength would be (10m/s)(505.1Hz)= 5051m?

Also, I'm not sure about part d. If I were to guess, I would use
E= (1/2)ρga^2
But I can't see how amplitude would change here, because ρ and g are constant!

Help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Better check the calc for frequency in (b); looks like you inverted it or something.
Yes, the speed changes as the water gets shallow.
The amplitude is related to the power and energy of the wave. It says energy is conserved, so you must have the same power in the shallow wave as in the ocean wave. If you don't have a formula for water wave power, you might check
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_power
The power depends on the period and amplitude, so if power stays constant amplitude will change when it goes shallow.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top