Tuning for force tracking in MR (Magneto-Rheological) dampers

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 1K views
Shuhaibul
I already create MR damper modelling by using non-parametric linearised data driven (NPLDD) double input model. The hysteresis curve behavior is 99.9% followed as per experimental data, Figure below:

Figure%201_Hysteresis%20Curve.jpg

Then, by using this model, I had created closed loop model for force tracking control. The closed loop is developed by using continuous state control and If-Then Rules block as below:

Figure%202_Closed%20Loop%20Diagram.jpg

The input Fd_des and velocity is set to be sine, square, and sawtooth waveform, so that the output (Fd_act) will exhibit the same as input (Fd_des). However, after several time tuning the value of G and B, the result for force tracking (F_act vs F_des) is not the same as below:

Figure%203_Sine%20wave_force%20tracking.jpg
Figure%204_Square%20wave_force%20tracking.jpg
Figure%205_Sawtooth%20wave_force%20tracking.jpg

All the result is not followed/tracked the input. The value of G and B are 0.05 and 2 respectively.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Thanks for your response. My aim is to get the graph to be match as close as possible. If the output graph follow exactly the input graph, the the force tracking tuning will be true. The spikes may due the tuning of G and B values. IF-THEN rules is used to ensure the input current will be in between 0 to 0.9A. Do you have any idea how to tune the G and B value? Or need to change to PID controller?